Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy S26
77Performance81
85.3Display60
58.6Camera47.3
77.3Battery62.1
73.3Features94.7
11 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)6 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S26
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 67.7, pulling ahead mainly in display (+25) and battery (+15). Samsung Galaxy S26 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 60
- Stronger camera score: 59 vs 47
- Stronger battery score: 77 vs 62
- 317% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 12 MP
- 317% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 12 MP
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S26
- Stronger performance score: 81 vs 77
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 73
- 133% higher OS update pledge: 7 years vs 3 years
- 25% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,824 vs 8,651
- 16% lower weight: 167 g vs 199 g
- Lower launch price: $900 vs $1,500
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S26 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+11% | 6.3 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi+12% | 411 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits+92% | 2,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | 90 %+3% |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S26 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Samsung Exynos 2600 (Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy in the US, China and Japan) |
| AnTuTu | 2,841,165 | 3,064,672+8% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956Top 15% | 2,995+1%Top 14% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651Top 16% | 10,824+25%Top 4% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+33% | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 256GB/512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S26 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S26 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh+16% | 4,300 mAh |
| Wired charging | 68 W+172% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W+100% | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h+8% | 15.3 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S26 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g | 167 g+16% |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 7.2 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Armor Aluminum 2 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S26 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S26 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 16 (One UI 8.5) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 7 years+133% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S26 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSSamsung Galaxy S26vs vivo X200 FEVSSamsung Galaxy S26vs REDMI K80 UltraVSSamsung Galaxy S26vs Nothing Phone (3)VSSamsung Galaxy S26vs Vivo X300 EVS

