Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
77Performance45.6
85.3Display58.3
58.6Camera42.1
77.3Battery36.9
73.3Features94.7
13 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)2 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 50.6, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+40) and performance (+31). Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 77 vs 46
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 58
- Stronger camera score: 59 vs 42
- Stronger battery score: 77 vs 37
- 400% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 10 MP
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 73
- 133% higher OS update pledge: 7 years vs 3 years
- Lower launch price: $900 vs $1,500
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+4% | 6.7 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1080x2640 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi+8% | 426 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits+92% | 2,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
| AnTuTu | 2,841,165 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956+45%Top 15% | 2,044Top 33% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651+28%Top 16% | 6,761Top 26% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 4K@60fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+400% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh+25% | 4,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 68 W+172% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W+100% | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g | 187 g+6% |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+52% | 14.9 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP48 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Armor Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 Gen 1 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 7 years+133% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FEvs Google Pixel 8aVSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FEvs POCO X7VSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FEvs Samsung Galaxy F55 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FEvs Redmi Note 14 Pro (4G)VS