Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
77Performance75.8
85.3Display58.4
58.6Camera55.7
77.3Battery47.9
73.3Features94.7
13 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)5 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 64.6, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+29) and display (+27). Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 58
- Stronger battery score: 77 vs 48
- 400% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 10 MP
- 317% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 12 MP
- 172% higher Wired charging: 68 W vs 25 W
- Lower launch price: $1,500 vs $2,000
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 73
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 133% higher OS update pledge: 7 years vs 3 years
- 14% higher Screen size: 8 ″ vs 7 ″
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″ | 8 ″+14% |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1968x2184 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi+26% | 368 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits+92% | 2,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | 90.6 %+4% |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | 2,841,165+26% | 2,250,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956Top 15% | 2,950Top 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651Top 16% | 9,300+8%Top 12% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+400% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh+14% | 4,400 mAh |
| Wired charging | 68 W+172% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W+100% | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h+65% | 10 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g+7% | 215 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+19% | 8.9 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP48 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Armor Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 7 years+133% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 7vs Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate DesignVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 7vs HONOR X9dVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 7vs iPhone DuoVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 7vs OPPO Reno14 Pro 5GVS