Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs TECNO CAMON 30
77Performance46.7
85.3Display47.4
58.6Camera49.8
77.3Battery59
73.3Features60
7 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)2 spec wins — TECNO CAMON 30
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 51.2, pulling ahead mainly in display (+38) and performance (+30). TECNO CAMON 30 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 77 vs 47
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 47
- Stronger camera score: 59 vs 50
- Stronger battery score: 77 vs 59
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 60
Reasons to pick the TECNO CAMON 30
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | TECNO CAMON 30 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+3% | 6.78 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1080x2436 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi+18% | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits+285% | 1,300 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | TECNO CAMON 30 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Helio G99 Ultimate |
| AnTuTu | 2,841,165 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956Top 15% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651Top 16% | — |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+33% | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | TECNO CAMON 30 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | — |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | — |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | TECNO CAMON 30 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 70 W+3% |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | — |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | TECNO CAMON 30 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g | 187 g+6% |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+6% | 7.7 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP53 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | TECNO CAMON 30 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | — |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | TECNO CAMON 30 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 14 (HiOS 14) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | TECNO CAMON 30 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | — |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSTECNO CAMON 30vs Xiaomi Mi 11VSTECNO CAMON 30vs Infinix NOTE EdgeVSTECNO CAMON 30vs Samsung Galaxy S20 UltraVSTECNO CAMON 30vs Google Pixel 7 ProVS