Skip to content
InnoReviews

Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs TECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5G

WINNER
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
74.7Inno Score
VS
TECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5G
59.3Inno Score
77Performance46.7
85.3Display72.2
58.6Camera58.6
77.3Battery59
73.3Features73.3
5 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)1 spec wins — TECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5G

InnoReviews verdict

Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 59.3, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+30) and battery (+18). TECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)

  • Stronger performance score: 77 vs 47
  • Stronger display score: 85 vs 72
  • Stronger battery score: 77 vs 59
  • 33% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 18% higher Pixel density: 462 ppi vs 393 ppi

Reasons to pick the TECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5G

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Display

Display comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5G
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5G
Screen size7 ″+3%6.78 ″
Panel typeLTPO AMOLEDAMOLED
Resolution1224x29921080x2436
Pixel density462 ppi+18%393 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz+15%144 Hz
Peak brightness5,000 nits—
Screen-to-body87.3 %—

Performance

Performance comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5G
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5G
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 EliteMediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate
AnTuTu2,841,165—
Geekbench 6 (single)2,956Top 15%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)8,651Top 16%—
RAM (max)16 GB+33%12 GB
Storage options512GB256/512GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0—

Camera

Camera comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5G
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5G
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.88
Ultra-wide50 MP50 MP
Max video8K@30fps—
Front camera50 MP50 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5G
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5G
Capacity5,000 mAh5,000 mAh
Wired charging68 W70 W+3%
Wireless charging30 W—
Active use endurance16.5 h—

Design

Design comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5G
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5G
Weight199 g—
Thickness7.2 mm+6%7.7 mm
IP ratingIP48—
Frame materialAluminum—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5G
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5G
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.45.2
NFCYes—
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C
eSIMYes—

Software

Software comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5G
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5G
OS at launchAndroid 16 (Hello UI)Android 14 (HiOS 14)
OS update pledge3 years—

Audio

Audio comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5G
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5G
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNo—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup