Skip to content
InnoReviews

Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs TECNO CAMON 30S Pro

WINNER
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
74.7Inno Score
VS
TECNO CAMON 30S Pro
45.3Inno Score
77Performance28.9
85.3Display47.4
58.6Camera49.8
77.3Battery56
73.3Features60
9 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)0 spec wins — TECNO CAMON 30S Pro

InnoReviews verdict

Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 45.3, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+48) and display (+38). TECNO CAMON 30S Pro still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)

  • Stronger performance score: 77 vs 29
  • Stronger display score: 85 vs 47
  • Stronger camera score: 59 vs 50
  • Stronger battery score: 77 vs 56
  • Stronger features score: 73 vs 60

Reasons to pick the TECNO CAMON 30S Pro

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Display

Display comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO CAMON 30S Pro
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO CAMON 30S Pro
Screen size7 ″+3%6.78 ″
Panel typeLTPO AMOLEDAMOLED
Resolution1224x29921080x2436
Pixel density462 ppi+18%393 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz+38%120 Hz
Peak brightness5,000 nits+285%1,300 nits
Screen-to-body87.3 %—

Performance

Performance comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO CAMON 30S Pro
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO CAMON 30S Pro
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 EliteMediaTek Helio G100
AnTuTu2,841,165—
Geekbench 6 (single)2,956Top 15%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)8,651Top 16%—
RAM (max)16 GB+100%8 GB
Storage options512GB256GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0—

Camera

Camera comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO CAMON 30S Pro
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO CAMON 30S Pro
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.88
Ultra-wide50 MP—
Max video8K@30fps—
Front camera50 MP50 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO CAMON 30S Pro
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO CAMON 30S Pro
Capacity5,000 mAh5,000 mAh
Wired charging68 W+51%45 W
Wireless charging30 W+50%20 W
Active use endurance16.5 h—

Design

Design comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO CAMON 30S Pro
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO CAMON 30S Pro
Weight199 g—
Thickness7.2 mm+7%7.8 mm
IP ratingIP48IP53
Frame materialAluminum—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO CAMON 30S Pro
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO CAMON 30S Pro
5GYesNo
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7—
Bluetooth5.4—
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB Type-C
eSIMYes—

Software

Software comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO CAMON 30S Pro
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO CAMON 30S Pro
OS at launchAndroid 16 (Hello UI)Android 14
OS update pledge3 years—

Audio

Audio comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO CAMON 30S Pro
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO CAMON 30S Pro
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNo—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup