Skip to content
InnoReviews

Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs TECNO CAMON 40

WINNER
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
74.7Inno Score
VS
TECNO CAMON 40
46.7Inno Score
77Performance28.9
85.3Display60
58.6Camera45.9
77.3Battery54.3
73.3Features60
9 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)1 spec wins — TECNO CAMON 40

InnoReviews verdict

Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 46.7, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+48) and display (+25). TECNO CAMON 40 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)

  • Stronger performance score: 77 vs 29
  • Stronger display score: 85 vs 60
  • Stronger camera score: 59 vs 46
  • Stronger battery score: 77 vs 54
  • Stronger features score: 73 vs 60

Reasons to pick the TECNO CAMON 40

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Display

Display comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO CAMON 40
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO CAMON 40
Screen size7 ″+3%6.78 ″
Panel typeLTPO AMOLEDAMOLED
Resolution1224x29921080x2436
Pixel density462 ppi+18%393 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz+38%120 Hz
Peak brightness5,000 nits—
Screen-to-body87.3 %—

Performance

Performance comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO CAMON 40
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO CAMON 40
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 EliteMediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate
AnTuTu2,841,165—
Geekbench 6 (single)2,956Top 15%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)8,651Top 16%—
RAM (max)16 GB+100%8 GB
Storage options512GB128/256GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0—

Camera

Camera comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO CAMON 40
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO CAMON 40
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8—
Ultra-wide50 MP+525%8 MP
Max video8K@30fps—
Front camera50 MP+56%32 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO CAMON 40
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO CAMON 40
Capacity5,000 mAh5,200 mAh+4%
Wired charging68 W+51%45 W
Wireless charging30 W—
Active use endurance16.5 h—

Design

Design comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO CAMON 40
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO CAMON 40
Weight199 g—
Thickness7.2 mm+2%7.3 mm
IP ratingIP48IP66
Frame materialAluminum—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO CAMON 40
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO CAMON 40
5GYesNo
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7—
Bluetooth5.4—
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB Type-C
eSIMYes—

Software

Software comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO CAMON 40
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO CAMON 40
OS at launchAndroid 16 (Hello UI)HiOS 15 (Android 15)
OS update pledge3 years—

Audio

Audio comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO CAMON 40
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO CAMON 40
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNo—

Related comparisons

Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSTECNO CAMON 40vs realme 13 5GVSTECNO CAMON 40vs Samsung Galaxy Note 20 UltraVSTECNO CAMON 40vs Tecno Spark 50 ProVSTECNO CAMON 40vs Infinix GT 30VS

Try another matchup