Skip to content
InnoReviews

Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs TECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5G

WINNER
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
74.7Inno Score
VS
TECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5G
64.3Inno Score
77Performance46.7
85.3Display79.1
58.6Camera69.3
77.3Battery60
73.3Features86.7
5 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)2 spec wins — TECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5G

InnoReviews verdict

Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 64.3, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+30) and battery (+17). TECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)

  • Stronger performance score: 77 vs 47
  • Stronger display score: 85 vs 79
  • Stronger battery score: 77 vs 60
  • 33% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 15% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 144 Hz

Reasons to pick the TECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5G

  • Stronger camera score: 69 vs 59
  • Stronger features score: 87 vs 73

Display

Display comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5G
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5G
Screen size7 ″+5%6.67 ″
Panel typeLTPO AMOLEDAMOLED
Resolution1224x29921260x2800
Pixel density462 ppi460 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz+15%144 Hz
Peak brightness5,000 nits—
Screen-to-body87.3 %—

Performance

Performance comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5G
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5G
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 EliteMediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate
AnTuTu2,841,165—
Geekbench 6 (single)2,956Top 15%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)8,651Top 16%—
RAM (max)16 GB+33%12 GB
Storage options512GB256GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0—

Camera

Camera comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5G
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5G
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8—
Ultra-wide50 MP50 MP
Telephoto—50 MP
Optical zoom—3 x
Max video8K@30fps—
Front camera50 MP50 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5G
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5G
Capacity5,000 mAh5,100 mAh+2%
Wired charging68 W70 W+3%
Wireless charging30 W—
Active use endurance16.5 h—

Design

Design comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5G
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5G
Weight199 g—
Thickness7.2 mm+6%7.7 mm
IP ratingIP48IP68/IP69
Frame materialAluminum—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5G
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5G
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7—
Bluetooth5.4—
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB Type-C
eSIMYes—

Software

Software comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5G
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5G
OS at launchAndroid 16 (Hello UI)HiOS 15 (Android 15)
OS update pledge3 years—

Audio

Audio comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5G
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5G
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNo—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup