Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G
77Performance25.9
85.3Display75.9
58.6Camera60.5
77.3Battery66.6
73.3Features73.3
9 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)1 spec wins — TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 55.7, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+51) and battery (+11). TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 77 vs 26
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 76
- Stronger battery score: 77 vs 67
- 525% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 8 MP
- 180% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,956 vs 1,057
Reasons to pick the TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G
- 30% higher capacity: 6,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+3% | 6.78 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1208x2644 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi+8% | 429 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+15% | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate |
| AnTuTu | 2,841,165 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956+180%Top 15% | 1,057Bottom 39% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651+175%Top 16% | 3,148Bottom 43% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+33% | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 256/512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+525% | 8 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 50 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,500 mAh+30% |
| Wired charging | 68 W+51% | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | — |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g | — |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+7% | 7.8 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP66/IP68/IP69/IP69K |
| Frame material | Aluminum | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | HiOS 16 (Android 16) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 3 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | — |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5Gvs POCO M8 Pro 5GVSTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5Gvs HONOR X60 ProVSTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5Gvs iQOO Z11SVSTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5Gvs vivo T4 ProVS