Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs Tecno Camon Slim 4G
77Performance28.9
85.3Display73
58.6Camera34.1
77.3Battery62.4
73.3Features49.3
8 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)3 spec wins — Tecno Camon Slim 4G
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 47.5, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+48) and camera (+25). Tecno Camon Slim 4G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 77 vs 29
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 73
- Stronger camera score: 59 vs 34
- Stronger battery score: 77 vs 62
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 49
Reasons to pick the Tecno Camon Slim 4G
- 12% higher capacity: 5,600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- 11% lower thickness: 6.4 mm vs 7.2 mm
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Tecno Camon Slim 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+3% | 6.78 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1224x2720 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi+5% | 440 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+15% | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | 87.7 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Tecno Camon Slim 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate |
| AnTuTu | 2,841,165 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956Top 15% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651Top 16% | — |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Tecno Camon Slim 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | — |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | — |
| Front camera | 50 MP+56% | 32 MP |
| OIS | Yes | No |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Tecno Camon Slim 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,600 mAh+12% |
| Wired charging | 68 W+13% | 60 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | — |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Tecno Camon Slim 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g | — |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 6.4 mm+11% |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Tecno Camon Slim 4G |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | — |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Tecno Camon Slim 4G |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 16 (HiOS 16.2) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 3 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Tecno Camon Slim 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSTecno Camon Slim 4Gvs OnePlus Nord CE6 LiteVSTecno Camon Slim 4Gvs OPPO A7 Pro 5GVSTecno Camon Slim 4Gvs Honor 90VSTecno Camon Slim 4Gvs Infinix NOTE 40 Pro+ 5GVS