Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs TECNO CAMON Slim 5G
77Performance28.9
85.3Display74.2
58.6Camera45.9
77.3Battery61.9
73.3Features65.3
7 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)4 spec wins — TECNO CAMON Slim 5G
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 51.6, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+48) and battery (+15). TECNO CAMON Slim 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 77 vs 29
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 74
- Stronger camera score: 59 vs 46
- Stronger battery score: 77 vs 62
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 65
Reasons to pick the TECNO CAMON Slim 5G
- 20% higher capacity: 6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- 14% lower weight: 171 g vs 199 g
- 11% lower thickness: 6.4 mm vs 7.2 mm
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | TECNO CAMON Slim 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+3% | 6.78 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1208x2644 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi+8% | 429 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+15% | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | 89.2 %+2% |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | TECNO CAMON Slim 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 7300e |
| AnTuTu | 2,841,165 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956Top 15% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651Top 16% | — |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | TECNO CAMON Slim 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+525% | 8 MP |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | — |
| Front camera | 50 MP+56% | 32 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | TECNO CAMON Slim 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh+20% |
| Wired charging | 68 W+51% | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | — |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | TECNO CAMON Slim 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g | 171 g+14% |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 6.4 mm+11% |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68/IP69K |
| Frame material | Aluminum | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | TECNO CAMON Slim 5G |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | — |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | TECNO CAMON Slim 5G |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | HiOS 16 (Android 16) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 3 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | TECNO CAMON Slim 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSTECNO CAMON Slim 5Gvs POCO F6VSTECNO CAMON Slim 5Gvs REDMI Note 15 5GVSTECNO CAMON Slim 5Gvs Samsung Galaxy A56VSTECNO CAMON Slim 5Gvs iPhone 14 ProVS