Skip to content
InnoReviews

Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs TECNO SPARK 40 Pro

WINNER
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
74.7Inno Score
VS
TECNO SPARK 40 Pro
47.1Inno Score
77Performance28.9
85.3Display77.8
58.6Camera30.1
77.3Battery54.3
73.3Features60
8 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)4 spec wins — TECNO SPARK 40 Pro

InnoReviews verdict

Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 47.1, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+48) and camera (+29). TECNO SPARK 40 Pro still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)

  • Stronger performance score: 77 vs 29
  • Stronger display score: 85 vs 78
  • Stronger camera score: 59 vs 30
  • Stronger battery score: 77 vs 54
  • Stronger features score: 73 vs 60

Reasons to pick the TECNO SPARK 40 Pro

  • 15% lower weight: 170 g vs 199 g

Display

Display comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO SPARK 40 Pro
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO SPARK 40 Pro
Screen size7 ″+3%6.78 ″
Panel typeLTPO AMOLEDAMOLED
Resolution1224x29921224x2720
Pixel density462 ppi+5%440 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz+15%144 Hz
Peak brightness5,000 nits+11%4,500 nits
Screen-to-body87.3 %89.3 %+2%

Performance

Performance comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO SPARK 40 Pro
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO SPARK 40 Pro
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 EliteMediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate
AnTuTu2,841,165—
Geekbench 6 (single)2,956Top 15%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)8,651Top 16%—
RAM (max)16 GB+100%8 GB
Storage options512GB128/256GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0—

Camera

Camera comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO SPARK 40 Pro
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO SPARK 40 Pro
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8—
Ultra-wide50 MP—
Max video8K@30fps1440p@30fps
Front camera50 MP+285%13 MP
OISYes—

Battery

Battery comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO SPARK 40 Pro
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO SPARK 40 Pro
Capacity5,000 mAh5,200 mAh+4%
Wired charging68 W+51%45 W
Wireless charging30 W—
Active use endurance16.5 h—

Design

Design comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO SPARK 40 Pro
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO SPARK 40 Pro
Weight199 g170 g+15%
Thickness7.2 mm6.7 mm+7%
IP ratingIP48IP64
Frame materialAluminum—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO SPARK 40 Pro
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO SPARK 40 Pro
5GYesNo
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
Bluetooth5.4—
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 2.0
eSIMYes—

Software

Software comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO SPARK 40 Pro
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO SPARK 40 Pro
OS at launchAndroid 16 (Hello UI)Android 15 (HiOS 15)
OS update pledge3 years—

Audio

Audio comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO SPARK 40 Pro
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO SPARK 40 Pro
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNo—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup