Skip to content
InnoReviews

Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs TECNO SPARK 40 Pro+

WINNER
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
74.7Inno Score
VS
TECNO SPARK 40 Pro+
48.5Inno Score
77Performance28.9
85.3Display79.4
58.6Camera30.1
77.3Battery59.6
73.3Features60
9 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)3 spec wins — TECNO SPARK 40 Pro+

InnoReviews verdict

Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 48.5, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+48) and camera (+29). TECNO SPARK 40 Pro+ still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)

  • Stronger performance score: 77 vs 29
  • Stronger display score: 85 vs 79
  • Stronger camera score: 59 vs 30
  • Stronger battery score: 77 vs 60
  • Stronger features score: 73 vs 60

Reasons to pick the TECNO SPARK 40 Pro+

  • 20% lower weight: 160 g vs 199 g
  • 10% lower thickness: 6.5 mm vs 7.2 mm

Display

Display comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO SPARK 40 Pro+
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO SPARK 40 Pro+
Screen size7 ″+3%6.78 ″
Panel typeLTPO AMOLEDAMOLED
Resolution1224x29921224x2720
Pixel density462 ppi+5%440 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz+15%144 Hz
Peak brightness5,000 nits+11%4,500 nits
Screen-to-body87.3 %—

Performance

Performance comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO SPARK 40 Pro+
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO SPARK 40 Pro+
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 EliteMediaTek Helio G200
AnTuTu2,841,165—
Geekbench 6 (single)2,956Top 15%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)8,651Top 16%—
RAM (max)16 GB+100%8 GB
Storage options512GB128/256GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0—

Camera

Camera comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO SPARK 40 Pro+
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO SPARK 40 Pro+
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8—
Ultra-wide50 MP—
Max video8K@30fps—
Front camera50 MP+285%13 MP
OISYesNo

Battery

Battery comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO SPARK 40 Pro+
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO SPARK 40 Pro+
Capacity5,000 mAh5,200 mAh+4%
Wired charging68 W+51%45 W
Wireless charging30 W30 W
Active use endurance16.5 h—

Design

Design comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO SPARK 40 Pro+
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO SPARK 40 Pro+
Weight199 g160 g+20%
Thickness7.2 mm6.5 mm+10%
IP ratingIP48IP64
Frame materialAluminum—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO SPARK 40 Pro+
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO SPARK 40 Pro+
5GYesNo
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7—
Bluetooth5.4—
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0—
eSIMYes—

Software

Software comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO SPARK 40 Pro+
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO SPARK 40 Pro+
OS at launchAndroid 16 (Hello UI)HiOS 15.1 (Android 15)
OS update pledge3 years—

Audio

Audio comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO SPARK 40 Pro+
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO SPARK 40 Pro+
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNo—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup