Skip to content
InnoReviews

Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs TECNO SPARK Go 3 Pro

WINNER
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
74.7Inno Score
VS
TECNO SPARK Go 3 Pro
33Inno Score
77Performance20
85.3Display50.5
58.6Camera20.5
77.3Battery40.7
73.3Features46.7
11 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)2 spec wins — TECNO SPARK Go 3 Pro

InnoReviews verdict

Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 33, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+57) and camera (+38). TECNO SPARK Go 3 Pro still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)

  • Stronger performance score: 77 vs 20
  • Stronger display score: 85 vs 51
  • Stronger camera score: 59 vs 21
  • Stronger battery score: 77 vs 41
  • Stronger features score: 73 vs 47

Reasons to pick the TECNO SPARK Go 3 Pro

  • Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't

Display

Display comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO SPARK Go 3 Pro
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO SPARK Go 3 Pro
Screen size7 ″+3%6.78 ″
Panel typeLTPO AMOLEDIPS LCD
Resolution1224x2992720x1600
Pixel density462 ppi+78%259 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz+38%120 Hz
Peak brightness5,000 nits—
Screen-to-body87.3 %—

Performance

Performance comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO SPARK Go 3 Pro
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO SPARK Go 3 Pro
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 EliteUnisoc T7250
AnTuTu2,841,165—
Geekbench 6 (single)2,956Top 15%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)8,651Top 16%—
RAM (max)16 GB+300%4 GB
Storage options512GB64/128GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0—

Camera

Camera comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO SPARK Go 3 Pro
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO SPARK Go 3 Pro
Main camera50 MP+285%13 MP
Main aperturef/1.8—
Ultra-wide50 MP—
Max video8K@30fps—
Front camera50 MP+525%8 MP
OISYesNo

Battery

Battery comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO SPARK Go 3 Pro
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO SPARK Go 3 Pro
Capacity5,000 mAh5,200 mAh+4%
Wired charging68 W+353%15 W
Wireless charging30 W—
Active use endurance16.5 h—

Design

Design comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO SPARK Go 3 Pro
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO SPARK Go 3 Pro
Weight199 g—
Thickness7.2 mm+11%8.1 mm
IP ratingIP48IP68/IP69
Frame materialAluminumPlastic

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO SPARK Go 3 Pro
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO SPARK Go 3 Pro
5GYesNo
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band
Bluetooth5.4—
NFCYesNo
USBUSB-C 2.0USB Type-C
eSIMYes—

Software

Software comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO SPARK Go 3 Pro
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO SPARK Go 3 Pro
OS at launchAndroid 16 (Hello UI)HiOS 16 (Android 16)
OS update pledge3 years—

Audio

Audio comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus TECNO SPARK Go 3 Pro
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)TECNO SPARK Go 3 Pro
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoYes

Related comparisons

Try another matchup