Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra
77Performance55.2
85.3Display53.7
58.6Camera46.8
77.3Battery94.7
73.3Features60
11 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)4 spec wins — Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 61.6, pulling ahead mainly in display (+32) and performance (+22). Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 77 vs 55
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 54
- Stronger camera score: 59 vs 47
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 60
- 127% higher Peak brightness: 5,000 nits vs 2,200 nits
Reasons to pick the Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra
- Stronger battery score: 95 vs 77
- 112% higher capacity: 10,600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- 76% higher Wired charging: 120 W vs 68 W
- 67% higher Wireless charging: 50 W vs 30 W
- Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't
- Lower launch price: $1,000 vs $1,500
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+5% | 6.67 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1080x2400 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi+17% | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits+127% | 2,200 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ |
| AnTuTu | 2,841,165 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956+37%Top 15% | 2,158Top 29% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651+22%Top 16% | 7,082Top 22% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| OIS | Yes | No |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 10,600 mAh+112% |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 120 W+76% |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | 50 W+67% |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g+56% | 450 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+63% | 19.4 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68/IP69K |
| Frame material | Aluminum | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 14 |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSUlefone Armor 28 Ultravs iPhone AirVSUlefone Armor 28 Ultravs Huawei Mate XT Ultimate DesignVSUlefone Armor 28 Ultravs iQOO Z9 TurboVSUlefone Armor 28 Ultravs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 UltraVS

