Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs vivo X200
77Performance64.4
85.3Display73.3
58.6Camera65.5
77.3Battery70.3
73.3Features73.3
6 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)3 spec wins — vivo X200
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 68.5, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+13) and display (+12). vivo X200 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 77 vs 64
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 73
- Stronger battery score: 77 vs 70
- 56% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 32 MP
- 38% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
Reasons to pick the vivo X200
- Stronger camera score: 66 vs 59
- 32% higher Wired charging: 90 W vs 68 W
- 16% higher capacity: 5,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | vivo X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+5% | 6.67 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1260x2800 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits+11% | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | vivo X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| AnTuTu | 2,841,165 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956Top 15% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651Top 16% | — |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 256/512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | vivo X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 50 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 4K@60fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+56% | 32 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | vivo X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,800 mAh+16% |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 90 W+32% |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | — |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | vivo X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g | 197 g+1% |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+10% | 8 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | vivo X200 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | vivo X200 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | vivo X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5mm jack | No | — |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSvivo X200vs HONOR 400 ProVSvivo X200vs realme GT 7TVSvivo X200vs Xiaomi 14T ProVSvivo X200vs HONOR Magic6 ProVS