Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs vivo X200 FE
77Performance51.2
85.3Display76.3
58.6Camera60.5
77.3Battery85.5
73.3Features78.7
8 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)5 spec wins — vivo X200 FE
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 67.7, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+26) and display (+9). vivo X200 FE still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 77 vs 51
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 76
- 525% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 8 MP
- 51% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,956 vs 1,960
- 38% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
Reasons to pick the vivo X200 FE
- Stronger battery score: 86 vs 77
- Stronger features score: 79 vs 73
- 33% higher OS update pledge: 4 years vs 3 years
- 32% higher Wired charging: 90 W vs 68 W
- 30% higher capacity: 6,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | vivo X200 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+11% | 6.31 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1216x2640 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits | 5,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | 90.2 %+3% |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | vivo X200 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ |
| AnTuTu | 2,841,165 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956+51%Top 15% | 1,960Top 35% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651+31%Top 16% | 6,606Top 27% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | — | 60 %Bottom 22% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 256/512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | vivo X200 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.88 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+525% | 8 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 50 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 4K@60fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | vivo X200 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,500 mAh+30% |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 90 W+32% |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | — |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h+8% | 15.3 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | vivo X200 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g | 186 g+7% |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+10% | 8 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | vivo X200 FE |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | vivo X200 FE |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 4 years+33% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | vivo X200 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSvivo X200 FEvs Samsung Galaxy S26VSvivo X200 FEvs REDMI K80 UltraVSvivo X200 FEvs Nothing Phone (3)VSvivo X200 FEvs Vivo X300 EVS

