Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs vivo X200 Pro mini
77Performance71.3
85.3Display73.8
58.6Camera65.5
77.3Battery74.7
73.3Features86.7
9 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)4 spec wins — vivo X200 Pro mini
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 72.8, pulling ahead mainly in display (+12) and performance (+6). vivo X200 Pro mini still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 77 vs 71
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 74
- 56% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 32 MP
- 38% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
- 14% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,956 vs 2,589
Reasons to pick the vivo X200 Pro mini
- Stronger camera score: 66 vs 59
- Stronger features score: 87 vs 73
- 32% higher Wired charging: 90 W vs 68 W
- 14% higher capacity: 5,700 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+11% | 6.31 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1216x2640 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits+11% | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | 90.5 %+4% |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 2,841,165 | 2,439,691Top 28% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 716,503Top 28% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 837,229Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 328,282Top 35% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 557,677Top 24% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956+14%Top 15% | 2,589Top 21% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651+7%Top 16% | 8,078Top 18% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | — | 48 %Bottom 7% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 50 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 4K@60fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+56% | 32 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,700 mAh+14% |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 90 W+32% |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | 30 W |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g | 187 g+6% |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+12% | 8.2 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 15 (OriginOS 5) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSvivo X200 Pro minivs Google Pixel 11 Pro XLVSvivo X200 Pro minivs Huawei nova 16 UltraVSvivo X200 Pro minivs iPhone 17 Pro MaxVSvivo X200 Pro minivs iQOO 15RVS