Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs Vivo X300
77Performance85.4
85.3Display73.5
58.6Camera78.1
77.3Battery87.2
73.3Features84
5 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)11 spec wins — Vivo X300
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X300 wins this phone face-off, 81.8 to 74.7, pulling ahead mainly in camera (+19) and features (+11). Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 74
- 38% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
- 11% higher Screen size: 7 ″ vs 6.31 ″
- 11% higher Peak brightness: 5,000 nits vs 4,500 nits
Reasons to pick the Vivo X300
- Stronger performance score: 85 vs 77
- Stronger camera score: 78 vs 59
- Stronger battery score: 87 vs 77
- Stronger features score: 84 vs 73
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+11% | 6.31 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1216x2640 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi | 461 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits+11% | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | 90.1 %+3% |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| AnTuTu | 2,841,165 | 3,416,530+20% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956Top 15% | 3,446+17%Top 7% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651Top 16% | 9,843+14%Top 8% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.68 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 50 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 4K@120fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,040 mAh+21% |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 90 W+32% |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | 40 W+33% |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h | 17.5 h+6% |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g | 190 g+5% |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+9% | 8 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 16 (OriginOS 6) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 5 years+67% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSVivo X300vs OPPO Find X9 ProVSVivo X300vs OnePlus 15VSVivo X300vs Xiaomi 17T ProVSVivo X300vs Huawei Mate 80 RS Ultimate DesignVS