Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs Vivo X300 E
77Performance46.7
85.3Display84
58.6Camera60.5
77.3Battery81.6
73.3Features86.7
8 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)2 spec wins — Vivo X300 E
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 67.9, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+30) and display (+1). Vivo X300 E still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 77 vs 47
- 525% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 8 MP
- 33% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 12 GB
- 15% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 144 Hz
- Has eSIM — the other doesn't
Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 E
- Stronger battery score: 82 vs 77
- Stronger features score: 87 vs 73
- 44% higher capacity: 7,200 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- 32% higher Wired charging: 90 W vs 68 W
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X300 E |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+6% | 6.59 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1260x2750 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi+1% | 459 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+15% | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits | 5,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X300 E |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 |
| AnTuTu | 2,841,165 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956Top 15% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651Top 16% | — |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+33% | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 256/512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X300 E |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+525% | 8 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 50 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | — |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X300 E |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 7,200 mAh+44% |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 90 W+32% |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | — |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X300 E |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+8% | 7.8 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X300 E |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X300 E |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 16 (OriginOS 6) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X300 E |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSVivo X300 Evs Nothing Phone (3)VSVivo X300 Evs Huawei Mate 80VSVivo X300 Evs 8849 Tank 5 ProVSVivo X300 Evs OPPO Find N5VS