Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs Vivo X300s
77Performance64.4
85.3Display78.5
58.6Camera78.1
77.3Battery88.7
73.3Features84
5 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)6 spec wins — Vivo X300s
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X300s wins this phone face-off, 76.8 to 74.7, pulling ahead mainly in camera (+19) and battery (+11). Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 77 vs 64
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 79
- 15% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 144 Hz
- 10% lower thickness: 7.2 mm vs 8 mm
Reasons to pick the Vivo X300s
- Stronger camera score: 78 vs 59
- Stronger battery score: 89 vs 77
- Stronger features score: 84 vs 73
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 67% higher OS update pledge: 5 years vs 3 years
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X300s |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+3% | 6.78 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1260x2800 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi+2% | 452 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+15% | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | 91.1 %+4% |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X300s |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| AnTuTu | 2,841,165 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956Top 15% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651Top 16% | — |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X300s |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.68 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 50 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 4K@120fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X300s |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 7,100 mAh+42% |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 90 W+32% |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | 40 W+33% |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X300s |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g+8% | 217 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+10% | 8 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X300s |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X300s |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 16 (OriginOS 6) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 5 years+67% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X300s |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSVivo X300svs RedMagic 11S ProVSVivo X300svs Redmi K70 UltraVSVivo X300svs nubia NaviX UltraVSVivo X300svs OnePlus 13VS