Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs Xiaomi 17T Pro
77Performance84.8
85.3Display74.1
58.6Camera61.4
77.3Battery95
73.3Features100
8 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)5 spec wins — Xiaomi 17T Pro
InnoReviews verdict
Xiaomi 17T Pro wins this phone face-off, 81.5 to 74.7, pulling ahead mainly in features (+27) and battery (+18). Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 74
- 317% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 12 MP
- 56% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 32 MP
- 43% higher Peak brightness: 5,000 nits vs 3,500 nits
- 15% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 144 Hz
Reasons to pick the Xiaomi 17T Pro
- Stronger performance score: 85 vs 77
- Stronger battery score: 95 vs 77
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 73
- 67% higher Wireless charging: 50 W vs 30 W
- 47% higher Wired charging: 100 W vs 68 W
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Xiaomi 17T Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+2% | 6.83 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1280x2772 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi+3% | 447 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+15% | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits+43% | 3,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | 91.1 %+4% |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Xiaomi 17T Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 2,841,165 | 3,182,664Top 10% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 911,618Top 10% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 1,228,396Top 9% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 401,602Top 17% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 641,048Top 11% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956Top 15% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651Top 16% | — |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Xiaomi 17T Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.67 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 50 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 5 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+56% | 32 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Xiaomi 17T Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 7,000 mAh+40% |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 100 W+47% |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | 50 W+67% |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h | 20.3 h+23% |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Xiaomi 17T Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g+9% | 219 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+13% | 8.3 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Xiaomi 17T Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Xiaomi 17T Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 16 (HyperOS 3) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Xiaomi 17T Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSXiaomi 17T Provs OnePlus 15VSXiaomi 17T Provs Huawei Mate 80 RS Ultimate DesignVSXiaomi 17T Provs Xiaomi 17 UltraVSXiaomi 17T Provs OPPO Find X9 ProVS