Skip to content
InnoReviews

CMF Phone 1 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

CMF Phone 1

Nothing

CMF Phone 1

$199

40Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
57.4Inno Score
21.8Performance64.4
51.5Display43.7
30.7Camera55.7
67.2Battery60.8
36Features60
5 spec wins — CMF Phone 18 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

InnoReviews verdict

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold wins this phone face-off, 57.4 to 40, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+43) and camera (+25). CMF Phone 1 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the CMF Phone 1

  • Stronger display score: 52 vs 44
  • Stronger battery score: 67 vs 61
  • 60% higher Front camera: 16 MP vs 10 MP
  • 47% higher Pixel density: 395 ppi vs 269 ppi
  • 36% lower weight: 197 g vs 309 g
  • Lower launch price: $199 vs $2,899

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • Stronger performance score: 64 vs 22
  • Stronger camera score: 56 vs 31
  • Stronger features score: 60 vs 36
  • 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
  • 100% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 8 GB

Display

Display comparison: CMF Phone 1 versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecCMF Phone 1Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Screen size6.67 ″10 ″+50%
Panel typeSuper AMOLEDFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution1080x24002160x1584
Pixel density395 ppi+47%269 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness2,000 nits+25%1,600 nits
Screen-to-body85.1 %—

Performance

Performance comparison: CMF Phone 1 versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecCMF Phone 1Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7300Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
Geekbench 6 (single)1,027Bottom 35%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)2,948Bottom 38%—
Wild Life Extreme stability100 %Top 3%—
RAM (max)8 GB16 GB+100%
Storage options128GB/256GB512GB/1TB

Camera

Camera comparison: CMF Phone 1 versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecCMF Phone 1Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Main camera50 MP200 MP+300%
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.7
Ultra-wide—12 MP
Telephoto—10 MP
Optical zoom—3 x
Max video4K@30fps—
Front camera16 MP+60%10 MP
OISNoYes

Battery

Battery comparison: CMF Phone 1 versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecCMF Phone 1Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Capacity5,000 mAh5,600 mAh+12%
Wired charging33 W45 W+36%
Wireless charging0 W15 W
Active use endurance16.2 h—

Design

Design comparison: CMF Phone 1 versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecCMF Phone 1Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Weight197 g+36%309 g
Thickness8.2 mm+36%12.9 mm
IP ratingIP52IP48
Frame material—Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: CMF Phone 1 versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecCMF Phone 1Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
5GYesYes
Wi-Fi—Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.35.4
NFCNo—
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C
eSIMNoYes

Software

Software comparison: CMF Phone 1 versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecCMF Phone 1Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
OS at launchAndroid 14 (Nothing OS 2.6)Android 16 (One UI 8)
OS update pledge2 years—

Audio

Audio comparison: CMF Phone 1 versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecCMF Phone 1Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Stereo speakersNo—
3.5mm jackNo—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup