OPPO Find X9 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
91.2Performance64.4
81Display43.7
83.2Camera55.7
95Battery60.8
84Features60
11 spec wins — OPPO Find X9 Ultra1 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
InnoReviews verdict
OPPO Find X9 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 87.6 to 57.4, pulling ahead mainly in display (+37) and battery (+34). Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the OPPO Find X9 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 91 vs 64
- Stronger display score: 81 vs 44
- Stronger camera score: 83 vs 56
- Stronger battery score: 95 vs 61
- Stronger features score: 84 vs 60
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 47% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.82 ″
Display
| Spec | OPPO Find X9 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.82 ″ | 10 ″+47% |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 3168x1440 | 2160x1584 |
| Pixel density | 510 ppi+90% | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz+20% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,600 nits+125% | 1,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 94.6 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | OPPO Find X9 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | 4,110,112 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 3,626Top 4% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 10,895Top 4% | — |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 40 %Bottom 3% | — |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | — |
Camera
| Spec | OPPO Find X9 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.5 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | 200 MP+1900% | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | 3 x | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | — |
| Front camera | 50 MP+400% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | OPPO Find X9 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 7,050 mAh+26% | 5,600 mAh |
| Wired charging | 100 W+122% | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | 50 W+233% | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | 20.2 h | — |
Design
| Spec | OPPO Find X9 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 235 g+24% | 309 g |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm+33% | 12.9 mm |
| IP rating | IP66/IP68/IP69 | IP48 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame |
Connectivity
| Spec | OPPO Find X9 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | OPPO Find X9 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (ColorOS 16) | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
| OS update pledge | 5 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | OPPO Find X9 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5mm jack | No | — |
Related comparisons
OPPO Find X9 Ultravs iQOO 15 UltraVSOPPO Find X9 Ultravs Vivo X300 UltraVSOPPO Find X9 Ultravs Honor Magic8 ProVSOPPO Find X9 Ultravs realme GT 8 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VS