OPPO Find X9s Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
82.8Performance64.4
64.7Display43.7
79Camera55.7
88.7Battery60.8
86.7Features60
11 spec wins — OPPO Find X9s Pro2 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
InnoReviews verdict
OPPO Find X9s Pro wins this phone face-off, 80 to 57.4, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+28) and features (+27). Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the OPPO Find X9s Pro
- Stronger performance score: 83 vs 64
- Stronger display score: 65 vs 44
- Stronger camera score: 79 vs 56
- Stronger battery score: 89 vs 61
- Stronger features score: 87 vs 60
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 58% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.32 ″
Display
| Spec | OPPO Find X9s Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.32 ″ | 10 ″+58% |
| Panel type | AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 2640x1216 | 2160x1584 |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi+71% | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz+20% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,800 nits+13% | 1,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 90.7 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | OPPO Find X9s Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | 3,280,652Top 8% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 925,261Top 8% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 1,205,422Top 10% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 439,595Top 7% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 710,374Top 7% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 3,299Top 9% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 9,402Top 12% | — |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 60 %Bottom 24% | — |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | — |
Camera
| Spec | OPPO Find X9s Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | 200 MP+1900% | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | 2.8 x | 3 x+7% |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | — |
| Front camera | 32 MP+220% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | OPPO Find X9s Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 7,025 mAh+25% | 5,600 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80 W+78% | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | 50 W+233% | 15 W |
Design
| Spec | OPPO Find X9s Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 198 g+36% | 309 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm+35% | 12.9 mm |
| IP rating | IP66/IP68/IP69 | IP48 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame |
Connectivity
| Spec | OPPO Find X9s Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6.1 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C |
| eSIM | — | Yes |
Software
| Spec | OPPO Find X9s Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (ColorOS 16) | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
Audio
| Spec | OPPO Find X9s Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5mm jack | No | — |
Related comparisons
OPPO Find X9s Provs POCO F8 UltraVSOPPO Find X9s Provs POCO F9 ProVSOPPO Find X9s Provs RedMagic 11 ProVSOPPO Find X9s Provs Xiaomi 17VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VS