OPPO Find X9s vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
76.8Performance64.4
72.7Display43.7
65.5Camera55.7
79.8Battery60.8
73.3Features60
9 spec wins — OPPO Find X9s3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
InnoReviews verdict
OPPO Find X9s wins this phone face-off, 74 to 57.4, pulling ahead mainly in display (+29) and battery (+19). Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the OPPO Find X9s
- Stronger performance score: 77 vs 64
- Stronger display score: 73 vs 44
- Stronger camera score: 66 vs 56
- Stronger battery score: 80 vs 61
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 60
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 52% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.59 ″
- 33% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 12 GB
Display
| Spec | OPPO Find X9s | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.59 ″ | 10 ″+52% |
| Panel type | AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 2760x1256 | 2160x1584 |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi+71% | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,600 nits+125% | 1,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 95.4 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | OPPO Find X9s | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | 2,726,802Top 24% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 809,783Top 20% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 905,149Top 25% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 410,777Top 14% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 601,093Top 18% | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | — |
Camera
| Spec | OPPO Find X9s | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | 50 MP+400% | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | 3 x | 3 x |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | — |
| Front camera | 32 MP+220% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | OPPO Find X9s | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 7,025 mAh+25% | 5,600 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80 W+78% | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | — | 15 W |
Design
| Spec | OPPO Find X9s | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 202 g+35% | 309 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm+38% | 12.9 mm |
| IP rating | IP66/IP68/IP69 | IP48 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame |
Connectivity
| Spec | OPPO Find X9s | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6.1 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB-C | USB-C |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | OPPO Find X9s | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (ColorOS 16) | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
Audio
| Spec | OPPO Find X9s | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | — |
Related comparisons
OPPO Find X9svs Huawei Pura 90 Pro MaxVSOPPO Find X9svs Motorola Razr FoldVSOPPO Find X9svs RedMagic 10 ProVSOPPO Find X9svs Xiaomi 15T ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VS