OPPO K13 Turbo vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
42.6Performance64.4
59.6Display43.7
30.7Camera55.7
79.8Battery60.8
60Features60
6 spec wins — OPPO K13 Turbo3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold wins this phone face-off, 57.4 to 52.8, pulling ahead mainly in camera (+25) and performance (+22). OPPO K13 Turbo still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the OPPO K13 Turbo
- Stronger display score: 60 vs 44
- Stronger battery score: 80 vs 61
- 78% higher Wired charging: 80 W vs 45 W
- 68% higher Pixel density: 453 ppi vs 269 ppi
- 60% higher Front camera: 16 MP vs 10 MP
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Stronger performance score: 64 vs 43
- Stronger camera score: 56 vs 31
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 47% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.8 ″
- Has OIS — the other doesn't
Display
| Spec | OPPO K13 Turbo | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.8 ″ | 10 ″+47% |
| Panel type | AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 2800x1280 | 2160x1584 |
| Pixel density | 453 ppi+68% | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,600 nits | 1,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 93.5 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | OPPO K13 Turbo | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 8450 | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,424Top 47% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 5,975Top 32% | — |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
Camera
| Spec | OPPO K13 Turbo | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | — | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | — |
| Front camera | 16 MP+60% | 10 MP |
| OIS | No | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | OPPO K13 Turbo | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 7,000 mAh+25% | 5,600 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80 W+78% | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | — | 15 W |
Design
| Spec | OPPO K13 Turbo | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 207 g+33% | 309 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm+36% | 12.9 mm |
| IP rating | IPX6/IPX8/IPX9 | IP48 |
| Frame material | Plastic | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame |
Connectivity
| Spec | OPPO K13 Turbo | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB-C | USB-C |
| eSIM | — | Yes |
Software
| Spec | OPPO K13 Turbo | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 (ColorOS 15) | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
| OS update pledge | 2 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | OPPO K13 Turbo | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5mm jack | No | — |
Related comparisons
OPPO K13 Turbovs Samsung Galaxy S23VSOPPO K13 Turbovs TECNO CAMON 50 ProVSOPPO K13 Turbovs realme P2 Pro 5GVSOPPO K13 Turbovs Redmi Note 14SVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VS