OPPO Reno12 F 4G vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
28.9Performance80
58.3Display66.7
34.1Camera74
52.5Battery65.8
46.7Features94.7
3 spec wins — OPPO Reno12 F 4G10 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 74.8 to 42.3, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+51) and features (+48). OPPO Reno12 F 4G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the OPPO Reno12 F 4G
- 167% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 12 MP
- 14% lower weight: 187 g vs 218 g
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 80 vs 29
- Stronger display score: 67 vs 58
- Stronger camera score: 74 vs 34
- Stronger battery score: 66 vs 53
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 47
Display
| Spec | OPPO Reno12 F 4G | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.67 ″ | 6.9 ″+3% |
| Panel type | AMOLED | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1440x3120 |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 498 ppi+26% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,100 nits | 2,600 nits+24% |
| Screen-to-body | 92.2 % | 92.5 % |
Performance
| Spec | OPPO Reno12 F 4G | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 685 | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | — | 2,787,981Top 21% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 895,141Top 11% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 989,555Top 21% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 348,188Top 27% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 555,097Top 27% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 3,030Top 13% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 9,800Top 8% |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Storage options | 256GB / 512GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | OPPO Reno12 F 4G | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 8 MP | 50 MP+525% |
| Telephoto | — | 50 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 5 x |
| Max video | 1080p@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+167% | 12 MP |
| OIS | No | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | OPPO Reno12 F 4G | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | — | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 13 h |
Design
| Spec | OPPO Reno12 F 4G | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 187 g+14% | 218 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm+6% | 8.2 mm |
| IP rating | IP64 | IP68 |
| Frame material | — | Titanium |
Connectivity
| Spec | OPPO Reno12 F 4G | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | — | Yes |
| USB | USB-C | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
Software
| Spec | OPPO Reno12 F 4G | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 (ColorOS 14) | Android 15 (One UI 7) |
| OS update pledge | — | 7 years |
Audio
| Spec | OPPO Reno12 F 4G | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
OPPO Reno12 F 4Gvs iPhone 12 Pro MaxVSOPPO Reno12 F 4Gvs Motorola Moto G Power (2026)VSOPPO Reno12 F 4Gvs vivo V30eVSOPPO Reno12 F 4Gvs POCO X3 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs HONOR 600 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)VSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs Motorola Edge 70 MaxVS