OPPO Reno13 F 5G vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
25.3Performance64.4
53.2Display43.7
45.9Camera55.7
60Battery60.8
100Features60
5 spec wins — OPPO Reno13 F 5G5 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold wins this phone face-off, 57.4 to 49.4, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+39) and camera (+10). OPPO Reno13 F 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the OPPO Reno13 F 5G
- Stronger display score: 53 vs 44
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 60
- 220% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 10 MP
- 46% higher Pixel density: 394 ppi vs 269 ppi
- 40% lower thickness: 7.8 mm vs 12.9 mm
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Stronger performance score: 64 vs 25
- Stronger camera score: 56 vs 46
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 50% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.67 ″
- 50% higher ultra-wide: 12 MP vs 8 MP
Display
| Spec | OPPO Reno13 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.67 ″ | 10 ″+50% |
| Panel type | AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 2160x1584 |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi+46% | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | 1,600 nits+33% |
| Screen-to-body | 92.2 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | OPPO Reno13 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 934Bottom 25% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,703Bottom 29% | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
Camera
| Spec | OPPO Reno13 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 8 MP | 12 MP+50% |
| Telephoto | — | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | — |
| Front camera | 32 MP+220% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | OPPO Reno13 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,800 mAh+4% | 5,600 mAh |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | — | 15 W |
Design
| Spec | OPPO Reno13 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 192 g+38% | 309 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm+40% | 12.9 mm |
| IP rating | IP66/IP68/IP69 | IP48 |
| Frame material | Plastic | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame |
Connectivity
| Spec | OPPO Reno13 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB-C | USB-C |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | OPPO Reno13 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 (ColorOS 15) | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
Audio
| Spec | OPPO Reno13 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5mm jack | No | — |
Related comparisons
OPPO Reno13 F 5Gvs Motorola Razr (2026)VSOPPO Reno13 F 5Gvs OPPO A6 Pro 5GVSOPPO Reno13 F 5Gvs Tecno Pova 8 5GVSOPPO Reno13 F 5Gvs vivo T3 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VS