OPPO Reno13 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
29.9Performance64.4
57.6Display43.7
49.8Camera55.7
66.7Battery60.8
100Features60
5 spec wins — OPPO Reno135 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold wins this phone face-off, 57.4 to 53.8, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+35) and camera (+6). OPPO Reno13 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the OPPO Reno13
- Stronger display score: 58 vs 44
- Stronger battery score: 67 vs 61
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 60
- 400% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 10 MP
- 78% higher Wired charging: 80 W vs 45 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Stronger performance score: 64 vs 30
- Stronger camera score: 56 vs 50
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 52% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.59 ″
- 50% higher ultra-wide: 12 MP vs 8 MP
Display
| Spec | OPPO Reno13 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.59 ″ | 10 ″+52% |
| Panel type | AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 2760x1256 | 2160x1584 |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi+71% | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | 1,600 nits+33% |
| Screen-to-body | 93.4 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | OPPO Reno13 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,322Top 50% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,846Top 49% | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
Camera
| Spec | OPPO Reno13 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 8 MP | 12 MP+50% |
| Telephoto | — | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | — |
| Front camera | 50 MP+400% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | OPPO Reno13 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,600 mAh | 5,600 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80 W+78% | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | — | 15 W |
Design
| Spec | OPPO Reno13 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 181 g+41% | 309 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+44% | 12.9 mm |
| IP rating | IP66/IP68/IP69 | IP48 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame |
Connectivity
| Spec | OPPO Reno13 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB-C | USB-C |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | OPPO Reno13 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 (ColorOS 15) | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
Audio
| Spec | OPPO Reno13 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5mm jack | No | — |
Related comparisons
OPPO Reno13vs iPhone 16eVSOPPO Reno13vs Infinix NOTE 40 ProVSOPPO Reno13vs realme P4 Power 5GVSOPPO Reno13vs Samsung Galaxy S21 UltraVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VS