OPPO Reno16 F 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
46.7Performance80
55Display66.7
61.4Camera74
79.8Battery65.8
73.3Features94.7
5 spec wins — OPPO Reno16 F 5G8 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 74.8 to 60.6, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+33) and features (+21). OPPO Reno16 F 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the OPPO Reno16 F 5G
- Stronger battery score: 80 vs 66
- 317% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 12 MP
- 78% higher Wired charging: 80 W vs 45 W
- 40% higher capacity: 7,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- 11% lower weight: 195 g vs 218 g
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 80 vs 47
- Stronger display score: 67 vs 55
- Stronger camera score: 74 vs 61
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 73
- 525% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 8 MP
Display
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.57 ″ | 6.9 ″+5% |
| Panel type | AMOLED | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 2372x1080 | 1440x3120 |
| Pixel density | 397 ppi | 498 ppi+25% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits | 2,600 nits+86% |
| Screen-to-body | 92.8 % | 92.5 % |
Performance
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Dimensity 7300-Energy | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | — | 2,787,981Top 21% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 895,141Top 11% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 989,555Top 21% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 348,188Top 27% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 555,097Top 27% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 3,030Top 13% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 9,800Top 8% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 128GB / 256GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 8 MP | 50 MP+525% |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Optical zoom | 3.5 x | 5 x+43% |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 7,000 mAh+40% | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80 W+78% | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | — | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 13 h |
Design
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 195 g+11% | 218 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.2 mm+3% |
| IP rating | IP68/IP69K | IP68 |
| Frame material | Plastic | Titanium |
Connectivity
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (ColorOS 16) | Android 15 (One UI 7) |
| OS update pledge | — | 7 years |
Audio
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
OPPO Reno16 F 5Gvs Huawei nova 14 ProVSOPPO Reno16 F 5Gvs Huawei Mate X7VSOPPO Reno16 F 5Gvs POCO F6 ProVSOPPO Reno16 F 5Gvs realme GT 6TVSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs HONOR 600 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)VSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs Motorola Edge 70 MaxVS