OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G vs Vivo X200 Pro
72.9Performance74.5
67.1Display73.2
79.1Camera72
85.5Battery79.9
73.3Features78.7
9 spec wins — OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G7 spec wins — Vivo X200 Pro
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G scores 75.6 against 75.2 for Vivo X200 Pro. Pick by the categories that matter to you — OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G edges ahead in camera and battery, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G
- Stronger camera score: 79 vs 72
- Stronger battery score: 86 vs 80
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 56% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 32 MP
- 50% higher Active use endurance: 19.5 h vs 13 h
Reasons to pick the Vivo X200 Pro
- Stronger display score: 73 vs 67
- Stronger features score: 79 vs 73
- 300% higher telephoto: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 150% higher Peak brightness: 4,500 nits vs 1,800 nits
- 33% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 12 GB
Display
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.32 ″ | 6.78 ″+7% |
| Panel type | AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 2640x1216 | 1260x2800 |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi+2% | 452 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz+20% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,800 nits | 4,500 nits+150% |
| Screen-to-body | 93.4 %+3% | 90.3 % |
Performance
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Dimensity 8550 Super | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| AnTuTu | 2,294,761 | 2,550,000+11% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 2,800Top 23% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 8,600Top 21% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 256GB / 512GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 200 MP+300% | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Optical zoom | 3.5 x | 3.7 x+6% |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+56% | 32 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 6,700 mAh+12% | 6,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 90 W+13% |
| Wireless charging | — | 30 W |
| Active use endurance | 19.5 h+50% | 13 h |
Design
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 188 g+16% | 223 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm+4% | 8.5 mm |
| IP rating | IP68/IP69K | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (ColorOS 16) | Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15) |
| OS update pledge | — | 4 years |
Audio
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
OPPO Reno16 Pro 5Gvs OPPO Find X10 Pro MaxVSOPPO Reno16 Pro 5Gvs Honor 500 ProVSOPPO Reno16 Pro 5Gvs Redmi K100 ProVSOPPO Reno16 Pro 5Gvs Xiaomi 15 UltraVSVivo X200 Provs OPPO Find X10VSVivo X200 Provs Motorola Edge 70 MaxVSVivo X200 Provs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSVivo X200 Provs OPPO Find X10 Pro MaxVS