OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra
72.9Performance87.6
67.1Display67.4
79.1Camera77
85.5Battery81
73.3Features100
7 spec wins — OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G6 spec wins — Xiaomi 17 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
Xiaomi 17 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 81.4 to 75.6, pulling ahead mainly in features (+27) and performance (+15). OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G
- Stronger battery score: 86 vs 81
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 20% higher Refresh rate: 144 Hz vs 120 Hz
- 14% lower weight: 188 g vs 219 g
- 12% higher capacity: 6,700 mAh vs 6,000 mAh
Reasons to pick the Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 88 vs 73
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 73
- 300% higher telephoto: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 94% higher Peak brightness: 3,500 nits vs 1,800 nits
- 33% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 12 GB
Display
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Xiaomi 17 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.32 ″ | 6.9 ″+9% |
| Panel type | AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 2640x1216 | 1200x2608 |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi+11% | 416 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz+20% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,800 nits | 3,500 nits+94% |
| Screen-to-body | 93.4 %+1% | 92.3 % |
Performance
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Xiaomi 17 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Dimensity 8550 Super | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 2,294,761 | 3,600,724Top 6% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 1,032,276Top 6% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 1,345,109Top 6% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 495,988Top 2% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 727,351Top 6% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Xiaomi 17 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 200 MP+300% | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.67 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Optical zoom | 3.5 x | 4.3 x+23% |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Xiaomi 17 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 6,700 mAh+12% | 6,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 90 W+13% |
| Wireless charging | — | 50 W |
| Active use endurance | 19.5 h | — |
Design
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Xiaomi 17 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 188 g+14% | 219 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm+1% | 8.3 mm |
| IP rating | IP68/IP69K | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Xiaomi 17 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Xiaomi 17 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (ColorOS 16) | Android 16 (HyperOS 3) |
Audio
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Xiaomi 17 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
OPPO Reno16 Pro 5Gvs OPPO Find X10 Pro MaxVSOPPO Reno16 Pro 5Gvs Honor 500 ProVSOPPO Reno16 Pro 5Gvs Redmi K100 ProVSOPPO Reno16 Pro 5Gvs REDMI K80 ProVSXiaomi 17 Ultravs Huawei Mate 80 RS Ultimate DesignVSXiaomi 17 Ultravs Xiaomi 17T ProVSXiaomi 17 Ultravs OnePlus 15VSXiaomi 17 Ultravs Vivo X300 ProVS

