Skip to content
InnoReviews

POCO F3 vs Vivo X300

POCO F3

Xiaomi

POCO F3

$349

41.4Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Vivo X300
81.8Inno Score
34.7Performance85.4
47.5Display73.5
31.3Camera78.1
43.3Battery87.2
65.3Features84
2 spec wins — POCO F314 spec wins — Vivo X300

InnoReviews verdict

Vivo X300 wins this phone face-off, 81.8 to 41.4, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+51) and camera (+47). POCO F3 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the POCO F3

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Vivo X300

  • Stronger performance score: 85 vs 35
  • Stronger display score: 74 vs 48
  • Stronger camera score: 78 vs 31
  • Stronger battery score: 87 vs 43
  • Stronger features score: 84 vs 65

Display

Display comparison: POCO F3 versus Vivo X300
SpecPOCO F3Vivo X300
Screen size6.67 ″+6%6.31 ″
Panel typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution2400x10801216x2640
Pixel density395 ppi461 ppi+17%
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,300 nits4,500 nits+246%
Screen-to-body—90.1 %

Performance

Performance comparison: POCO F3 versus Vivo X300
SpecPOCO F3Vivo X300
ChipsetSnapdragon 870MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared990,057Bottom 39%3,416,530
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)378,834Bottom 39%—
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)171,089Bottom 39%—
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)173,146Bottom 38%—
AnTuTu 11 (UX)266,988Bottom 33%—
Geekbench 6 (single)1,050Bottom 37%3,446+228%Top 7%
Geekbench 6 (multi)3,000Bottom 40%9,843+228%Top 8%
RAM (max)8 GB16 GB+100%
Storage options128GB / 256GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: POCO F3 versus Vivo X300
SpecPOCO F3Vivo X300
Main camera48 MP200 MP+317%
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.68
Ultra-wide8 MP50 MP+525%
Telephoto—50 MP
Optical zoom—3 x
Max video4K@30fps4K@120fps
Front camera20 MP50 MP+150%
OISNoYes

Battery

Battery comparison: POCO F3 versus Vivo X300
SpecPOCO F3Vivo X300
Capacity4,520 mAh6,040 mAh+34%
Wired charging33 W90 W+173%
Wireless charging—40 W
Active use endurance—17.5 h

Design

Design comparison: POCO F3 versus Vivo X300
SpecPOCO F3Vivo X300
Weight196 g190 g+3%
Thickness7.8 mm+2%8 mm
IP ratingIP53IP68/IP69
Frame materialPlasticAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: POCO F3 versus Vivo X300
SpecPOCO F3Vivo X300
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.15.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 3.2
eSIMNoYes

Software

Software comparison: POCO F3 versus Vivo X300
SpecPOCO F3Vivo X300
OS at launchAndroid 11 (MIUI 12)Android 16 (OriginOS 6)
OS update pledge3 years5 years+67%

Audio

Audio comparison: POCO F3 versus Vivo X300
SpecPOCO F3Vivo X300
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup