Skip to content
InnoReviews

POCO F3 vs Vivo X300 Ultra

POCO F3

Xiaomi

POCO F3

$349

41.4Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Vivo X300 Ultra
88.1Inno Score
34.7Performance93.3
47.5Display82.3
31.3Camera84.6
43.3Battery91.5
65.3Features84
2 spec wins — POCO F315 spec wins — Vivo X300 Ultra

InnoReviews verdict

Vivo X300 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 88.1 to 41.4, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+59) and camera (+53). POCO F3 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the POCO F3

  • 16% lower weight: 196 g vs 232 g

Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Stronger performance score: 93 vs 35
  • Stronger display score: 82 vs 48
  • Stronger camera score: 85 vs 31
  • Stronger battery score: 92 vs 43
  • Stronger features score: 84 vs 65

Display

Display comparison: POCO F3 versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecPOCO F3Vivo X300 Ultra
Screen size6.67 ″6.82 ″+2%
Panel typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution2400x10801440x3168
Pixel density395 ppi510 ppi+29%
Refresh rate120 Hz144 Hz+20%
Peak brightness1,300 nits4,500 nits+246%
Screen-to-body—90.3 %

Performance

Performance comparison: POCO F3 versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecPOCO F3Vivo X300 Ultra
ChipsetSnapdragon 870Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared990,057Bottom 39%4,085,695
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)378,834Bottom 39%—
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)171,089Bottom 39%—
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)173,146Bottom 38%—
AnTuTu 11 (UX)266,988Bottom 33%—
Geekbench 6 (single)1,050Bottom 37%3,730+255%Top 3%
Geekbench 6 (multi)3,000Bottom 40%11,494+283%Top 3%
RAM (max)8 GB16 GB+100%
Storage options128GB / 256GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: POCO F3 versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecPOCO F3Vivo X300 Ultra
Main camera48 MP200 MP+317%
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.9
Ultra-wide8 MP50 MP+525%
Telephoto—200 MP
Optical zoom—3.7 x
Max video4K@30fps8K@30fps
Front camera20 MP50 MP+150%
OISNoYes

Battery

Battery comparison: POCO F3 versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecPOCO F3Vivo X300 Ultra
Capacity4,520 mAh6,600 mAh+46%
Wired charging33 W100 W+203%
Wireless charging—40 W
Active use endurance—16 h

Design

Design comparison: POCO F3 versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecPOCO F3Vivo X300 Ultra
Weight196 g+16%232 g
Thickness7.8 mm+5%8.2 mm
IP ratingIP53IP68/IP69
Frame materialPlasticAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: POCO F3 versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecPOCO F3Vivo X300 Ultra
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.15.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 3.2
eSIMNoYes

Software

Software comparison: POCO F3 versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecPOCO F3Vivo X300 Ultra
OS at launchAndroid 11 (MIUI 12)Android 16 (OriginOS 6)
OS update pledge3 years5 years+67%

Audio

Audio comparison: POCO F3 versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecPOCO F3Vivo X300 Ultra
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup