Skip to content
InnoReviews

POCO F4 GT vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

POCO F4 GT

Xiaomi

POCO F4 GT

$599

47.9Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
57.4Inno Score
45.4Performance64.4
44.1Display43.7
33.1Camera55.7
64.2Battery60.8
60Features60
5 spec wins — POCO F4 GT8 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

InnoReviews verdict

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold wins this phone face-off, 57.4 to 47.9, pulling ahead mainly in camera (+23) and performance (+19). POCO F4 GT still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the POCO F4 GT

  • Stronger battery score: 64 vs 61
  • 167% higher Wired charging: 120 W vs 45 W
  • 100% higher Front camera: 20 MP vs 10 MP
  • 47% higher Pixel density: 395 ppi vs 269 ppi
  • 34% lower thickness: 8.5 mm vs 12.9 mm
  • Lower launch price: $599 vs $2,899

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • Stronger performance score: 64 vs 45
  • Stronger camera score: 56 vs 33
  • 213% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 64 MP
  • 100% higher Peak brightness: 1,600 nits vs 800 nits
  • 50% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.67 ″

Display

Display comparison: POCO F4 GT versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecPOCO F4 GTSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Screen size6.67 ″10 ″+50%
Panel typeAMOLEDFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution2400x10802160x1584
Pixel density395 ppi+47%269 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness800 nits1,600 nits+100%

Performance

Performance comparison: POCO F4 GT versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecPOCO F4 GTSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 1Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
AnTuTu1,150,000—
Geekbench 6 (single)1,720Top 40%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)4,300Top 44%—
RAM (max)12 GB16 GB+33%
Storage options128GB / 256GB512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 3.1—

Camera

Camera comparison: POCO F4 GT versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecPOCO F4 GTSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Main camera64 MP200 MP+213%
Main aperturef/1.9f/1.7
Ultra-wide8 MP12 MP+50%
Telephoto—10 MP
Optical zoom—3 x
Max video4K@60fps—
Front camera20 MP+100%10 MP
OISNoYes

Battery

Battery comparison: POCO F4 GT versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecPOCO F4 GTSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Capacity4,700 mAh5,600 mAh+19%
Wired charging120 W+167%45 W
Wireless charging—15 W

Design

Design comparison: POCO F4 GT versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecPOCO F4 GTSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Weight210 g+32%309 g
Thickness8.5 mm+34%12.9 mm
IP rating—IP48
Frame materialAluminumTitanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: POCO F4 GT versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecPOCO F4 GTSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.25.4
NFCYes—
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C
eSIMNoYes

Software

Software comparison: POCO F4 GT versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecPOCO F4 GTSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
OS at launchAndroid 12 (MIUI 13)Android 16 (One UI 8)
OS update pledge2 years—

Audio

Audio comparison: POCO F4 GT versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecPOCO F4 GTSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Stereo speakersYes—
3.5mm jackNo—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup