POCO F7 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
77.5Performance64.4
68.5Display43.7
60.7Camera55.7
78.7Battery60.8
70.7Features60
9 spec wins — POCO F7 Ultra5 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
InnoReviews verdict
POCO F7 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 71.9 to 57.4, pulling ahead mainly in display (+25) and battery (+18). Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the POCO F7 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 78 vs 64
- Stronger display score: 69 vs 44
- Stronger camera score: 61 vs 56
- Stronger battery score: 79 vs 61
- Stronger features score: 71 vs 60
- Lower launch price: $649 vs $2,899
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 50% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.67 ″
- 20% higher Optical zoom: 3 x vs 2.5 x
- Has eSIM — the other doesn't
Display
| Spec | POCO F7 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.67 ″ | 10 ″+50% |
| Panel type | AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1440x3200 | 2160x1584 |
| Pixel density | 526 ppi+96% | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,200 nits+100% | 1,600 nits |
Performance
| Spec | POCO F7 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | 2,932,885Top 17% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 848,069Top 21% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 1,066,050Top 21% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 415,854Top 14% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 602,912Top 19% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,959Top 15% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,711Top 15% | — |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 70 %Bottom 40% | — |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 256/512GB | 512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | — |
Camera
| Spec | POCO F7 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 32 MP+167% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | 50 MP+400% | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | 2.5 x | 3 x+20% |
| Max video | 8K@24fps | — |
| Front camera | 32 MP+220% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | POCO F7 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,300 mAh | 5,600 mAh+6% |
| Wired charging | 120 W+167% | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | 50 W+233% | 15 W |
Design
| Spec | POCO F7 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 212 g+31% | 309 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm+35% | 12.9 mm |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP48 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame |
Connectivity
| Spec | POCO F7 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
Software
| Spec | POCO F7 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 (HyperOS 2) | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
| OS update pledge | 4 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | POCO F7 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5mm jack | No | — |
Related comparisons
POCO F7 Ultravs Honor 500VSPOCO F7 Ultravs vivo X100 UltraVSPOCO F7 Ultravs Asus ROG Phone 9 ProVSPOCO F7 Ultravs Honor Magic V Flip2VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VS