Skip to content
InnoReviews

POCO F9 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

WINNER
POCO F9 Pro

POCO

POCO F9 Pro

$699

79.9Inno Score
VS
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
57.4Inno Score
83.8Performance64.4
84.5Display43.7
64.4Camera55.7
85.7Battery60.8
78.7Features60
10 spec wins — POCO F9 Pro4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

InnoReviews verdict

POCO F9 Pro wins this phone face-off, 79.9 to 57.4, pulling ahead mainly in display (+41) and battery (+25). Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the POCO F9 Pro

  • Stronger performance score: 84 vs 64
  • Stronger display score: 85 vs 44
  • Stronger camera score: 64 vs 56
  • Stronger battery score: 86 vs 61
  • Stronger features score: 79 vs 60
  • Lower launch price: $699 vs $2,899

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • 52% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.59 ″
  • 50% higher ultra-wide: 12 MP vs 8 MP
  • 33% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 20% higher Optical zoom: 3 x vs 2.5 x

Display

Display comparison: POCO F9 Pro versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecPOCO F9 ProSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Screen size6.59 ″10 ″+52%
Panel typeAMOLEDFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution2510x11562160x1584
Pixel density419 ppi+56%269 ppi
Refresh rate185 Hz+54%120 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits+181%1,600 nits

Performance

Performance comparison: POCO F9 Pro versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecPOCO F9 ProSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V SeriesSnapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
AnTuTu3,351,073—
Geekbench 6 (single)3,411Top 7%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)10,347Top 6%—
Wild Life Extreme stability91 %Top 49%—
RAM (max)12 GB16 GB+33%
Storage options256GB / 512GB512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 4.1—

Camera

Camera comparison: POCO F9 Pro versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecPOCO F9 ProSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Main camera200 MP200 MP
Main aperturef/1.68f/1.7
Ultra-wide8 MP12 MP+50%
Telephoto50 MP+400%10 MP
Optical zoom2.5 x3 x+20%
Max video4K@60fps—
Front camera32 MP+220%10 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: POCO F9 Pro versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecPOCO F9 ProSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Capacity6,330 mAh+13%5,600 mAh
Wired charging100 W+122%45 W
Wireless charging50 W+233%15 W

Design

Design comparison: POCO F9 Pro versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecPOCO F9 ProSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Weight206 g+33%309 g
Thickness8.8 mm+32%12.9 mm
IP ratingIP68IP48
Frame materialAluminumTitanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: POCO F9 Pro versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecPOCO F9 ProSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth6.05.4
NFCYes—
USB—USB-C
eSIMYesYes

Software

Software comparison: POCO F9 Pro versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecPOCO F9 ProSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
OS at launchAndroid 16 (HyperOS 3)Android 16 (One UI 8)
OS update pledge4 years—

Audio

Audio comparison: POCO F9 Pro versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecPOCO F9 ProSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Stereo speakersYes—
3.5mm jackNo—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup