POCO F9 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
64.4Performance80
84.3Display66.7
78.2Camera74
92Battery65.8
78.7Features94.7
6 spec wins — POCO F9 Ultra4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
POCO F9 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 78.1 to 74.8, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+26) and display (+18). Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the POCO F9 Ultra
- Stronger display score: 84 vs 67
- Stronger camera score: 78 vs 74
- Stronger battery score: 92 vs 66
- 233% higher Wireless charging: 50 W vs 15 W
- 167% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 12 MP
- Lower launch price: $799 vs $1,300
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 80 vs 64
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 79
- 75% higher OS update pledge: 7 years vs 4 years
- 20% higher Pixel density: 498 ppi vs 416 ppi
Display
| Spec | POCO F9 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″ | 6.9 ″ |
| Panel type | AMOLED | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 2608x1200 | 1440x3120 |
| Pixel density | 416 ppi | 498 ppi+20% |
| Refresh rate | 185 Hz+54% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits+73% | 2,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body | — | 92.5 % |
Performance
| Spec | POCO F9 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | — | 2,787,981Top 21% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 895,141Top 11% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 989,555Top 21% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 348,188Top 27% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 555,097Top 27% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 3,030Top 13% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 9,800Top 8% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | POCO F9 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.68 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Optical zoom | 5 x | 5 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+167% | 12 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | POCO F9 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 8,050 mAh+61% | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 100 W+122% | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | 50 W+233% | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 13 h |
Design
| Spec | POCO F9 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 235 g | 218 g+7% |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 8.2 mm+6% |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Frame material | — | Titanium |
Connectivity
| Spec | POCO F9 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | POCO F9 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (HyperOS 3) | Android 15 (One UI 7) |
| OS update pledge | 4 years | 7 years+75% |
Audio
| Spec | POCO F9 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
POCO F9 Ultravs Vivo X Fold6VSPOCO F9 Ultravs OPPO Find N6VSPOCO F9 Ultravs vivo X200 UltraVSPOCO F9 Ultravs iPhone 18 Pro MaxVSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs HONOR 600 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)VSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs Motorola Edge 70 MaxVS