Skip to content
InnoReviews

POCO X3 NFC vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

POCO X3 NFC

Xiaomi

POCO X3 NFC

$229

40.2Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
57.4Inno Score
23.6Performance64.4
60.2Display43.7
34.2Camera55.7
49.4Battery60.8
44Features60
5 spec wins — POCO X3 NFC8 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

InnoReviews verdict

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold wins this phone face-off, 57.4 to 40.2, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+41) and camera (+22). POCO X3 NFC still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the POCO X3 NFC

  • Stronger display score: 60 vs 44
  • 100% higher Front camera: 20 MP vs 10 MP
  • 47% higher Pixel density: 395 ppi vs 269 ppi
  • 30% lower weight: 215 g vs 309 g
  • 27% lower thickness: 9.4 mm vs 12.9 mm
  • Lower launch price: $229 vs $2,899

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • Stronger performance score: 64 vs 24
  • Stronger camera score: 56 vs 34
  • Stronger battery score: 61 vs 49
  • Stronger features score: 60 vs 44
  • 213% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 64 MP

Display

Display comparison: POCO X3 NFC versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecPOCO X3 NFCSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Screen size6.67 ″10 ″+50%
Panel typeIPS LCDFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution2400x10802160x1584
Pixel density395 ppi+47%269 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness—1,600 nits

Performance

Performance comparison: POCO X3 NFC versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecPOCO X3 NFCSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
ChipsetSnapdragon 732GSnapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
AnTuTu410,000—
Geekbench 6 (single)740Bottom 16%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)1,950Bottom 14%—
RAM (max)6 GB16 GB+167%
Storage options64GB / 128GB512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 2.1—

Camera

Camera comparison: POCO X3 NFC versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecPOCO X3 NFCSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Main camera64 MP200 MP+213%
Main aperturef/1.9f/1.7
Ultra-wide13 MP+8%12 MP
Telephoto—10 MP
Optical zoom—3 x
Max video4K@30fps—
Front camera20 MP+100%10 MP
OISNoYes

Battery

Battery comparison: POCO X3 NFC versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecPOCO X3 NFCSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Capacity5,160 mAh5,600 mAh+9%
Wired charging33 W45 W+36%
Wireless charging—15 W

Design

Design comparison: POCO X3 NFC versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecPOCO X3 NFCSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Weight215 g+30%309 g
Thickness9.4 mm+27%12.9 mm
IP ratingIP53IP48
Frame materialPlasticTitanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: POCO X3 NFC versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecPOCO X3 NFCSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
5GNoYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.15.4
NFCYes—
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C
eSIMNoYes

Software

Software comparison: POCO X3 NFC versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecPOCO X3 NFCSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
OS at launchAndroid 10 (MIUI 12)Android 16 (One UI 8)
OS update pledge2 years—

Audio

Audio comparison: POCO X3 NFC versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecPOCO X3 NFCSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Stereo speakersYes—
3.5mm jackYes—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup