POCO X3 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
32.2Performance64.4
60.2Display43.7
31.3Camera55.7
49.4Battery60.8
44Features60
4 spec wins — POCO X3 Pro9 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold wins this phone face-off, 57.4 to 42.2, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+32) and camera (+24). POCO X3 Pro still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the POCO X3 Pro
- Stronger display score: 60 vs 44
- 100% higher Front camera: 20 MP vs 10 MP
- 47% higher Pixel density: 395 ppi vs 269 ppi
- 30% lower weight: 215 g vs 309 g
- 27% lower thickness: 9.4 mm vs 12.9 mm
- Lower launch price: $249 vs $2,899
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Stronger performance score: 64 vs 32
- Stronger camera score: 56 vs 31
- Stronger battery score: 61 vs 49
- Stronger features score: 60 vs 44
- 317% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 48 MP
Display
| Spec | POCO X3 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.67 ″ | 10 ″+50% |
| Panel type | IPS LCD | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 2160x1584 |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi+47% | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,600 nits |
Performance
| Spec | POCO X3 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 860 | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | 795,334Bottom 20% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 294,736Bottom 21% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 118,830Bottom 28% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 160,316Bottom 26% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 221,452Bottom 14% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 870Bottom 21% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,900Bottom 33% | — |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Storage options | 128GB / 256GB | 512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
Camera
| Spec | POCO X3 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP+317% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 8 MP | 12 MP+50% |
| Telephoto | — | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | — |
| Front camera | 20 MP+100% | 10 MP |
| OIS | No | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | POCO X3 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,160 mAh | 5,600 mAh+9% |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 45 W+36% |
| Wireless charging | — | 15 W |
Design
| Spec | POCO X3 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 215 g+30% | 309 g |
| Thickness | 9.4 mm+27% | 12.9 mm |
| IP rating | IP53 | IP48 |
| Frame material | Plastic | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame |
Connectivity
| Spec | POCO X3 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
Software
| Spec | POCO X3 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 11 (MIUI 12) | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
| OS update pledge | 2 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | POCO X3 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
POCO X3 Provs iPhone 12 Pro MaxVSPOCO X3 Provs Motorola Moto G Power (2026)VSPOCO X3 Provs OPPO Reno12 F 4GVSPOCO X3 Provs vivo V30eVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VS