Skip to content
InnoReviews

POCO X4 GT vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

POCO X4 GT

Xiaomi

POCO X4 GT

$379

50.2Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
57.4Inno Score
37.2Performance64.4
73.6Display43.7
32.3Camera55.7
59.1Battery60.8
60Features60
6 spec wins — POCO X4 GT7 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

InnoReviews verdict

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold wins this phone face-off, 57.4 to 50.2, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+27) and camera (+23). POCO X4 GT still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the POCO X4 GT

  • Stronger display score: 74 vs 44
  • 60% higher Front camera: 16 MP vs 10 MP
  • 51% higher Pixel density: 407 ppi vs 269 ppi
  • 49% higher Wired charging: 67 W vs 45 W
  • 35% lower weight: 200 g vs 309 g
  • Lower launch price: $379 vs $2,899

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • Stronger performance score: 64 vs 37
  • Stronger camera score: 56 vs 32
  • 213% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 64 MP
  • 100% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 8 GB
  • 52% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.6 ″

Display

Display comparison: POCO X4 GT versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecPOCO X4 GTSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Screen size6.6 ″10 ″+52%
Panel typeIPS LCDFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution2460x10802160x1584
Pixel density407 ppi+51%269 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz+20%120 Hz
Peak brightness—1,600 nits

Performance

Performance comparison: POCO X4 GT versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecPOCO X4 GTSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8100Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
AnTuTu1,050,000—
Geekbench 6 (single)1,180Bottom 45%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)3,800Bottom 50%—
RAM (max)8 GB16 GB+100%
Storage options128GB / 256GB512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 3.1—

Camera

Camera comparison: POCO X4 GT versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecPOCO X4 GTSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Main camera64 MP200 MP+213%
Main aperturef/1.9f/1.7
Ultra-wide8 MP12 MP+50%
Telephoto—10 MP
Optical zoom—3 x
Max video4K@30fps—
Front camera16 MP+60%10 MP
OISNoYes

Battery

Battery comparison: POCO X4 GT versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecPOCO X4 GTSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Capacity5,080 mAh5,600 mAh+10%
Wired charging67 W+49%45 W
Wireless charging—15 W

Design

Design comparison: POCO X4 GT versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecPOCO X4 GTSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Weight200 g+35%309 g
Thickness8.9 mm+31%12.9 mm
IP rating—IP48
Frame materialPlasticTitanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: POCO X4 GT versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecPOCO X4 GTSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.35.4
NFCYes—
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C
eSIMNoYes

Software

Software comparison: POCO X4 GT versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecPOCO X4 GTSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
OS at launchAndroid 12 (MIUI 13)Android 16 (One UI 8)
OS update pledge2 years—

Audio

Audio comparison: POCO X4 GT versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecPOCO X4 GTSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Stereo speakersYes—
3.5mm jackYes—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup