POCO X4 GT vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
37.2Performance64.4
73.6Display43.7
32.3Camera55.7
59.1Battery60.8
60Features60
6 spec wins — POCO X4 GT7 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold wins this phone face-off, 57.4 to 50.2, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+27) and camera (+23). POCO X4 GT still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the POCO X4 GT
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 44
- 60% higher Front camera: 16 MP vs 10 MP
- 51% higher Pixel density: 407 ppi vs 269 ppi
- 49% higher Wired charging: 67 W vs 45 W
- 35% lower weight: 200 g vs 309 g
- Lower launch price: $379 vs $2,899
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Stronger performance score: 64 vs 37
- Stronger camera score: 56 vs 32
- 213% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 64 MP
- 100% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 8 GB
- 52% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.6 ″
Display
| Spec | POCO X4 GT | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.6 ″ | 10 ″+52% |
| Panel type | IPS LCD | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 2460x1080 | 2160x1584 |
| Pixel density | 407 ppi+51% | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz+20% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,600 nits |
Performance
| Spec | POCO X4 GT | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | 1,050,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,180Bottom 45% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,800Bottom 50% | — |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Storage options | 128GB / 256GB | 512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
Camera
| Spec | POCO X4 GT | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP+213% |
| Main aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 8 MP | 12 MP+50% |
| Telephoto | — | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | — |
| Front camera | 16 MP+60% | 10 MP |
| OIS | No | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | POCO X4 GT | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,080 mAh | 5,600 mAh+10% |
| Wired charging | 67 W+49% | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | — | 15 W |
Design
| Spec | POCO X4 GT | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 200 g+35% | 309 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm+31% | 12.9 mm |
| IP rating | — | IP48 |
| Frame material | Plastic | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame |
Connectivity
| Spec | POCO X4 GT | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
Software
| Spec | POCO X4 GT | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 12 (MIUI 13) | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
| OS update pledge | 2 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | POCO X4 GT | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
POCO X4 GTvs OPPO Reno14 F 5GVSPOCO X4 GTvs realme 16 5GVSPOCO X4 GTvs Motorola Edge 50 NeoVSPOCO X4 GTvs Motorola Moto G Stylus (2026)VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VS