Skip to content
InnoReviews

POCO X6 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

POCO X6

Xiaomi

POCO X6

$249

45.6Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
57.4Inno Score
25.3Performance64.4
54.1Display43.7
44.1Camera55.7
59.3Battery60.8
65.3Features60
6 spec wins — POCO X67 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

InnoReviews verdict

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold wins this phone face-off, 57.4 to 45.6, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+39) and camera (+12). POCO X6 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the POCO X6

  • Stronger display score: 54 vs 44
  • Stronger features score: 65 vs 60
  • 66% higher Pixel density: 446 ppi vs 269 ppi
  • 60% higher Front camera: 16 MP vs 10 MP
  • 49% higher Wired charging: 67 W vs 45 W
  • Lower launch price: $249 vs $2,899

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • Stronger performance score: 64 vs 25
  • Stronger camera score: 56 vs 44
  • 213% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 64 MP
  • 50% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.67 ″
  • 50% higher ultra-wide: 12 MP vs 8 MP

Display

Display comparison: POCO X6 versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecPOCO X6Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Screen size6.67 ″10 ″+50%
Panel typeAMOLEDFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution1220x27122160x1584
Pixel density446 ppi+66%269 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,800 nits+13%1,600 nits

Performance

Performance comparison: POCO X6 versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecPOCO X6Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
ChipsetSnapdragon 7s Gen 2Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
Geekbench 6 (single)1,011Bottom 31%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)2,816Bottom 33%—
Wild Life Extreme stability98 %Top 43%—
RAM (max)12 GB16 GB+33%
Storage options256/512GB512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 2.2—

Camera

Camera comparison: POCO X6 versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecPOCO X6Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Main camera64 MP200 MP+213%
Main aperturef/1.79f/1.7
Ultra-wide8 MP12 MP+50%
Telephoto—10 MP
Optical zoom—3 x
Max video4K@30fps—
Front camera16 MP+60%10 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: POCO X6 versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecPOCO X6Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Capacity5,100 mAh5,600 mAh+10%
Wired charging67 W+49%45 W
Wireless charging0 W15 W

Design

Design comparison: POCO X6 versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecPOCO X6Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Weight181 g+41%309 g
Thickness8 mm+38%12.9 mm
IP ratingIP54IP48
Frame materialPlasticTitanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: POCO X6 versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecPOCO X6Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.25.4
NFCYes—
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C
eSIMNoYes

Software

Software comparison: POCO X6 versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecPOCO X6Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
OS at launchAndroid 13 (MIUI 14)Android 16 (One UI 8)
OS update pledge3 years—

Audio

Audio comparison: POCO X6 versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecPOCO X6Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Stereo speakersYes—
3.5mm jackYes—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup