POCO X7 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
34.5Performance64.4
62.2Display43.7
43.4Camera55.7
59Battery60.8
73.3Features60
5 spec wins — POCO X77 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold wins this phone face-off, 57.4 to 50.6, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+30) and camera (+12). POCO X7 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the POCO X7
- Stronger display score: 62 vs 44
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 60
- 100% higher Front camera: 20 MP vs 10 MP
- 88% higher Peak brightness: 3,000 nits vs 1,600 nits
- 66% higher Pixel density: 446 ppi vs 269 ppi
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Stronger performance score: 64 vs 35
- Stronger camera score: 56 vs 43
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 200% higher Optical zoom: 3 x vs 1 x
- 50% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.67 ″
Display
| Spec | POCO X7 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.67 ″ | 10 ″+50% |
| Panel type | AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1220x2712 | 2160x1584 |
| Pixel density | 446 ppi+66% | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+88% | 1,600 nits |
Performance
| Spec | POCO X7 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | 803,683Bottom 25% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 300,148Bottom 25% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 108,744Bottom 27% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 135,681Bottom 8% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 259,110Bottom 30% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,030Bottom 36% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,908Bottom 35% | — |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 100 %Top 3% | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 256/512GB | 512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
Camera
| Spec | POCO X7 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.5 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 8 MP | 12 MP+50% |
| Telephoto | — | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | 1 x | 3 x+200% |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | — |
| Front camera | 20 MP+100% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | POCO X7 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,110 mAh | 5,600 mAh+10% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | 0 W | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | 11.1 h | — |
Design
| Spec | POCO X7 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 186 g+40% | 309 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm+35% | 12.9 mm |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP48 |
| Frame material | Plastic | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame |
Connectivity
| Spec | POCO X7 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | POCO X7 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 (HyperOS 1.0) | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | POCO X7 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5mm jack | No | — |
Related comparisons
POCO X7vs Google Pixel 8aVSPOCO X7vs Samsung Galaxy F55 5GVSPOCO X7vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FEVSPOCO X7vs Redmi Note 14 Pro (4G)VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VS