realme 16T 5G vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
23Performance64.4
49.9Display43.7
30.7Camera55.7
81.9Battery60.8
46.7Features60
5 spec wins — realme 16T 5G7 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold wins this phone face-off, 57.4 to 44.1, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+41) and camera (+25). realme 16T 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the realme 16T 5G
- Stronger display score: 50 vs 44
- Stronger battery score: 82 vs 61
- 60% higher Front camera: 16 MP vs 10 MP
- 43% higher capacity: 8,000 mAh vs 5,600 mAh
- 31% lower thickness: 8.9 mm vs 12.9 mm
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Stronger performance score: 64 vs 23
- Stronger camera score: 56 vs 31
- Stronger features score: 60 vs 47
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 100% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 8 GB
Display
| Spec | realme 16T 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.81 ″ | 10 ″+47% |
| Panel type | IPS LCD | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 720x1570 | 2160x1584 |
| Pixel density | 254 ppi | 269 ppi+6% |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz+20% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | 1,600 nits+33% |
| Screen-to-body | 87.1 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | realme 16T 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,016Bottom 19% | — |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Storage options | 128GB / 256GB | 512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
Camera
| Spec | realme 16T 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | — | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 1080p@60fps | — |
| Front camera | 16 MP+60% | 10 MP |
| OIS | No | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | realme 16T 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 8,000 mAh+43% | 5,600 mAh |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | — | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | 22.7 h | — |
Design
| Spec | realme 16T 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 224 g+28% | 309 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm+31% | 12.9 mm |
| IP rating | IP68/IP69K | IP48 |
| Frame material | Plastic | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame |
Connectivity
| Spec | realme 16T 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | No | — |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB-C |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
Software
| Spec | realme 16T 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (realme UI 7.0) | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
Audio
| Spec | realme 16T 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | — |
Related comparisons
realme 16T 5Gvs Lava Agni 3 5GVSrealme 16T 5Gvs OPPO Reno13 F 4GVSrealme 16T 5Gvs iQOO Z11xVSrealme 16T 5Gvs Nothing Phone (4b)VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VS