RedMagic 11 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
95.2Performance64.4
67.1Display43.7
51.5Camera55.7
96.2Battery60.8
86.7Features60
11 spec wins — RedMagic 11 Pro2 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
InnoReviews verdict
RedMagic 11 Pro wins this phone face-off, 80.2 to 57.4, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+35) and performance (+31). Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the RedMagic 11 Pro
- Stronger performance score: 95 vs 64
- Stronger display score: 67 vs 44
- Stronger battery score: 96 vs 61
- Stronger features score: 87 vs 60
- 433% higher Wireless charging: 80 W vs 15 W
- Lower launch price: $699 vs $2,899
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Stronger camera score: 56 vs 52
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 46% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.85 ″
Display
| Spec | RedMagic 11 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.85 ″ | 10 ″+46% |
| Panel type | AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1216x2688 | 2160x1584 |
| Pixel density | 431 ppi+60% | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz+20% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,800 nits+13% | 1,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 95.3 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | RedMagic 11 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | 3,229,764 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 3,745Top 3% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 11,845Top 2% | — |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 75 %Bottom 43% | — |
| RAM (max) | 24 GB+50% | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB/512GB/1TB | 512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 Pro | — |
Camera
| Spec | RedMagic 11 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | — |
| Front camera | 16 MP+60% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | RedMagic 11 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 7,500 mAh+34% | 5,600 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80 W+78% | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | 80 W+433% | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | 20 h | — |
Design
| Spec | RedMagic 11 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 230 g+26% | 309 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm+31% | 12.9 mm |
| IP rating | IPX8 | IP48 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame |
Connectivity
| Spec | RedMagic 11 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C |
| eSIM | — | Yes |
Software
| Spec | RedMagic 11 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (RedMagic OS 11) | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
Audio
| Spec | RedMagic 11 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
RedMagic 11 Provs Xiaomi 17VSRedMagic 11 Provs POCO F8 UltraVSRedMagic 11 Provs OPPO Find X9s ProVSRedMagic 11 Provs POCO F9 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VS