RedMagic 9S Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
56.6Performance80
57.1Display66.7
51.5Camera74
75.1Battery65.8
86.7Features94.7
5 spec wins — RedMagic 9S Pro10 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 74.8 to 62.4, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+23) and camera (+23). RedMagic 9S Pro still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the RedMagic 9S Pro
- Stronger battery score: 75 vs 66
- 78% higher Wired charging: 80 W vs 45 W
- 33% higher Front camera: 16 MP vs 12 MP
- 30% higher capacity: 6,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't
- Lower launch price: $649 vs $1,300
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 80 vs 57
- Stronger display score: 67 vs 57
- Stronger camera score: 74 vs 52
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 87
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
Display
| Spec | RedMagic 9S Pro | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.8 ″ | 6.9 ″+1% |
| Panel type | AMOLED | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1116x2480 | 1440x3120 |
| Pixel density | 400 ppi | 498 ppi+25% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,600 nits | 2,600 nits+63% |
| Screen-to-body | 93.7 %+1% | 92.5 % |
Performance
| Spec | RedMagic 9S Pro | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Leading Version | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | — | 2,787,981Top 21% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 895,141Top 11% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 989,555Top 21% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 348,188Top 27% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 555,097Top 27% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,277Top 24% | 3,030+33%Top 13% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,097Top 22% | 9,800+38%Top 8% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB/512GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | RedMagic 9S Pro | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | — | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 50 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 5 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 16 MP+33% | 12 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | RedMagic 9S Pro | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 6,500 mAh+30% | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80 W+78% | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | 0 W | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 13 h |
Design
| Spec | RedMagic 9S Pro | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 229 g | 218 g+5% |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.2 mm+8% |
| IP rating | — | IP68 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Titanium |
Connectivity
| Spec | RedMagic 9S Pro | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
Software
| Spec | RedMagic 9S Pro | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 (RedMagic OS 9.5) | Android 15 (One UI 7) |
| OS update pledge | — | 7 years |
Audio
| Spec | RedMagic 9S Pro | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
RedMagic 9S Provs realme 16 Pro+ 5GVSRedMagic 9S Provs Google Pixel 9 ProVSRedMagic 9S Provs Huawei Pura XVSRedMagic 9S Provs vivo T4 UltraVSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs HONOR 600 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)VSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs Motorola Edge 70 MaxVS