RedMagic 9S Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
56.6Performance64.4
57.1Display43.7
51.5Camera55.7
75.1Battery60.8
86.7Features60
7 spec wins — RedMagic 9S Pro4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
InnoReviews verdict
RedMagic 9S Pro wins this phone face-off, 62.4 to 57.4, pulling ahead mainly in features (+27) and battery (+14). Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the RedMagic 9S Pro
- Stronger display score: 57 vs 44
- Stronger battery score: 75 vs 61
- Stronger features score: 87 vs 60
- 317% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 12 MP
- 78% higher Wired charging: 80 W vs 45 W
- Lower launch price: $649 vs $2,899
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Stronger performance score: 64 vs 57
- Stronger camera score: 56 vs 52
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 47% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.8 ″
- Has eSIM — the other doesn't
Display
| Spec | RedMagic 9S Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.8 ″ | 10 ″+47% |
| Panel type | AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1116x2480 | 2160x1584 |
| Pixel density | 400 ppi+49% | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,600 nits | 1,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 93.7 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | RedMagic 9S Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Leading Version | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,277Top 24% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,097Top 22% | — |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB/512GB | 512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
Camera
| Spec | RedMagic 9S Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | — | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | — |
| Front camera | 16 MP+60% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | RedMagic 9S Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 6,500 mAh+16% | 5,600 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80 W+78% | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | 0 W | 15 W |
Design
| Spec | RedMagic 9S Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 229 g+26% | 309 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm+31% | 12.9 mm |
| IP rating | — | IP48 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame |
Connectivity
| Spec | RedMagic 9S Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
Software
| Spec | RedMagic 9S Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 (RedMagic OS 9.5) | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
Audio
| Spec | RedMagic 9S Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
RedMagic 9S Provs realme 16 Pro+ 5GVSRedMagic 9S Provs Google Pixel 9 ProVSRedMagic 9S Provs Huawei Pura XVSRedMagic 9S Provs vivo T4 UltraVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VS