Skip to content
InnoReviews

Redmi Note 17 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

Redmi Note 17
42.9Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
57.4Inno Score
28.9Performance64.4
52.3Display43.7
30.7Camera55.7
71.3Battery60.8
33.3Features60
6 spec wins — Redmi Note 177 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

InnoReviews verdict

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold wins this phone face-off, 57.4 to 42.9, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+36) and features (+27). Redmi Note 17 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Redmi Note 17

  • Stronger display score: 52 vs 44
  • Stronger battery score: 71 vs 61
  • 60% higher Front camera: 16 MP vs 10 MP
  • 40% higher Pixel density: 376 ppi vs 269 ppi
  • 38% higher capacity: 7,700 mAh vs 5,600 mAh

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • Stronger performance score: 64 vs 29
  • Stronger camera score: 56 vs 31
  • Stronger features score: 60 vs 33
  • 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
  • 100% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 8 GB

Display

Display comparison: Redmi Note 17 versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecRedmi Note 17Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Screen size6.99 ″10 ″+43%
Panel typeAMOLEDFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution1080x23962160x1584
Pixel density376 ppi+40%269 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,800 nits+13%1,600 nits
Screen-to-body88.4 %—

Performance

Performance comparison: Redmi Note 17 versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecRedmi Note 17Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
ChipsetSnapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
RAM (max)8 GB16 GB+100%
Storage options128GB / 256GB512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 2.2—

Camera

Camera comparison: Redmi Note 17 versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecRedmi Note 17Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Main camera50 MP200 MP+300%
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.7
Ultra-wide—12 MP
Telephoto—10 MP
Optical zoom—3 x
Max video1080p@30fps—
Front camera16 MP+60%10 MP
OISNoYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Redmi Note 17 versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecRedmi Note 17Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Capacity7,700 mAh+38%5,600 mAh
Wired charging45 W45 W
Wireless charging0 W15 W

Design

Design comparison: Redmi Note 17 versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecRedmi Note 17Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Weight224 g+28%309 g
Thickness8.5 mm+34%12.9 mm
IP ratingIP65IP48
Frame materialPlasticTitanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Redmi Note 17 versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecRedmi Note 17Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
5GNoYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.05.4
NFCYes—
USBUSB-CUSB-C
eSIMNoYes

Software

Software comparison: Redmi Note 17 versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecRedmi Note 17Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
OS at launchAndroid 16 (HyperOS 3)Android 16 (One UI 8)

Audio

Audio comparison: Redmi Note 17 versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecRedmi Note 17Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Stereo speakersNo—
3.5mm jackNo—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup