Skip to content
InnoReviews

Redmi Note 17 5G vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

Redmi Note 17 5G
43.3Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
57.4Inno Score
28.9Performance64.4
49.8Display43.7
29Camera55.7
71.3Battery60.8
46.7Features60
5 spec wins — Redmi Note 17 5G7 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

InnoReviews verdict

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold wins this phone face-off, 57.4 to 43.3, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+36) and camera (+27). Redmi Note 17 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Redmi Note 17 5G

  • Stronger display score: 50 vs 44
  • Stronger battery score: 71 vs 61
  • 43% higher capacity: 8,000 mAh vs 5,600 mAh
  • 40% higher Pixel density: 376 ppi vs 269 ppi
  • 35% lower thickness: 8.4 mm vs 12.9 mm

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • Stronger performance score: 64 vs 29
  • Stronger camera score: 56 vs 29
  • Stronger features score: 60 vs 47
  • 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
  • 100% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 8 GB

Display

Display comparison: Redmi Note 17 5G versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecRedmi Note 17 5GSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Screen size6.99 ″10 ″+43%
Panel typeAMOLEDFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution2396x10802160x1584
Pixel density376 ppi+40%269 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,800 nits+13%1,600 nits

Performance

Performance comparison: Redmi Note 17 5G versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecRedmi Note 17 5GSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
ChipsetSnapdragon 4 Gen 4Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
RAM (max)8 GB16 GB+100%
Storage options128GB512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 2.2—

Camera

Camera comparison: Redmi Note 17 5G versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecRedmi Note 17 5GSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Main camera50 MP200 MP+300%
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.7
Ultra-wide—12 MP
Telephoto—10 MP
Optical zoom—3 x
Max video1080p@30fps—
Front camera8 MP10 MP+25%
OISNoYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Redmi Note 17 5G versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecRedmi Note 17 5GSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Capacity8,000 mAh+43%5,600 mAh
Wired charging45 W45 W
Wireless charging0 W15 W

Design

Design comparison: Redmi Note 17 5G versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecRedmi Note 17 5GSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Weight225 g+27%309 g
Thickness8.4 mm+35%12.9 mm
IP ratingIP65IP48
Frame material—Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Redmi Note 17 5G versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecRedmi Note 17 5GSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.15.4
USBUSB-CUSB-C
eSIMNoYes

Software

Software comparison: Redmi Note 17 5G versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecRedmi Note 17 5GSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
OS at launchAndroid 16 (HyperOS 3)Android 16 (One UI 8)
OS update pledge4 years—

Audio

Audio comparison: Redmi Note 17 5G versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecRedmi Note 17 5GSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Stereo speakersNo—
3.5mm jackNo—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup